A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Mitigating Burnout in an Oncological Unit: A Scoping Review
Tekijät: Alabi Rasheed Omobolaji, Hietanen Päivi, Elmusrati Mohammed, Youssef Omar, Almangush Alhadi, Mäkitie Antti A
Kustantaja: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Julkaisuvuosi: 2021
Journal: Frontiers in Public Health
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
Lehden akronyymi: FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH
Artikkelin numero: ARTN 677915
Vuosikerta: 9
Sivujen määrä: 14
eISSN: 2296-2565
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.677915
Verkko-osoite: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.677915/full
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/67652012
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to provide a scoping review on how to address and mitigate burnout in the profession of clinical oncology. Also, it examines how artificial intelligence (AI) can mitigate burnout in oncology.
Methods: We searched Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, for articles that examine how to address burnout in oncology.
Results: A total of 17 studies were found to examine how burnout in oncology can be mitigated. These interventions were either targeted at individuals (oncologists) or organizations where the oncologists work. The organizational interventions include educational (psychosocial and mindfulness-based course), art therapies and entertainment, team-based training, group meetings, motivational package and reward, effective leadership and policy change, and staff support. The individual interventions include equipping the oncologists with adequate training that include-communication skills, well-being and stress management, burnout education, financial independence, relaxation, self-efficacy, resilience, hobby adoption, and work-life balance for the oncologists. Similarly, AI is thought to be poised to offer the potential to mitigate burnout in oncology by enhancing the productivity and performance of the oncologists, reduce the workload and provide job satisfaction, and foster teamwork between the caregivers of patients with cancer.
Discussion: Burnout is common among oncologists and can be elicited from different types of situations encountered in the process of caring for patients with cancer. Therefore, for these interventions to achieve the touted benefits, combinatorial strategies that combine other interventions may be viable for mitigating burnout in oncology. With the potential of AI to mitigate burnout, it is important for healthcare providers to facilitate its use in daily clinical practices.
Conclusion: These combinatorial interventions can ensure job satisfaction, a supportive working environment, job retention for oncologists, and improved patient care. These interventions could be integrated systematically into routine cancer care for a positive impact on quality care, patient satisfaction, the overall success of the oncological ward, and the health organizations at large.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |