Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Considerations for Top-Down Governance for Biosecurity and Synthetic Biology




Hamilton R.A., Mampuys R., Galaitsi S.E., Collins A., Istomin I., Ahteensuu M., Bakanidze L.

Benjamin D. Trump, Marie-Valentine Florin, Edward Perkins, Igor Linkov

Security for Emerging Synthetic Biology and Biotechnology Threats

PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.

Dordrecht

2021

Emerging Threats of Synthetic Biology and Biotechnology - Addressing Security and Resilience Issues

NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security

NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

37

58

978-94-024-2085-2

978-94-024-2086-9

1874-6519

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2086-9_3

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-024-2086-9_3

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/67224033



Abstract

Synthetic biology promises to make biology easier to engineer (Endy 2005), enabling more people in less formal research settings to participate in modern biology. Leveraging advances in DNA sequencing and synthesis technologies, genetic assembly methods based on standard biological parts (e.g. BioBricks), and increasingly precise gene-editing tools (e.g. CRISPR), synthetic biology is helping increase the reliability of and accessibility to genetic engineering. Although potentially enabling tremendous opportunities for the advancement of the global bioeconomy, opening new avenues for the creation of health, wealth and environmental sustainability, the possibility of a more ‘democratic’ (widely accessible) bioengineering capability could equally yield new opportunities for accidental, unintended or deliberate misuse. Consequently, synthetic biology represents a quintessential ‘dual-use’ biotechnology – a technology with the capacity to enable significant benefits and risks (NRC 2004).


Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 11:41