A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Effectiveness of clinical exome sequencing in adult patients with difficult-to-diagnose neurological disorders




AuthorsSainio Markus T., Aaltio Juho, Hyttinen Virva, Kortelainen Mika, Ojanen Simo, Paetau Anders, Tienari Pentti, Ylikallio Emil, Auranen Mari, Tyynismaa Henna

PublisherWiley

Publication year2022

JournalActa Neurologica Scandinavica

Volume145

Issue1

First page 63

Last page72

eISSN1600-0404

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13522

Web address https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ane.13522

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/66887467


Abstract

Objectives
Clinical diagnostics in adults with hereditary neurological diseases is complicated by clinical and genetic heterogeneity, as well as lifestyle effects. Here, we evaluate the effectiveness of exome sequencing and clinical costs in our difficult-to-diagnose adult patient cohort. Additionally, we expand the phenotypic and genetic spectrum of hereditary neurological disorders in Finland.

Methods
We performed clinical exome sequencing (CES) to 100 adult patients from Finland with neurological symptoms of suspected genetic cause. The patients were classified as myopathy (n = 57), peripheral neuropathy (n = 16), ataxia (n = 15), spastic paraplegia (n = 4), Parkinsonism (n = 3), and mixed (n = 5). In addition, we gathered the costs of prior diagnostic work-up to retrospectively assess the cost-effectiveness of CES as a first-line diagnostic tool.

Results
The overall diagnostic yield of CES was 27%. Pathogenic variants were found for 14 patients (in genes ANO5, CHCHD10, CLCN1, DES, DOK7, FKBP14, POLG, PYROXD1, SCN4A, TUBB3, and TTN) and likely pathogenic previously undescribed variants for 13 patients (in genes ABCD1, AFG3L2, ATL1, CACNA1A, COL6A1, DYSF, IRF2BPL, KCNA1, MT-ATP6, SAMD9L, SGCB, and TPM2). Age of onset below 40 years increased the probability of finding a genetic cause. Our cost evaluation of prior diagnostic work-up suggested that early CES would be cost-effective in this patient group, in which diagnostic costs increase linearly with prolonged investigations.

Conclusions
Based on our results, CES is a cost-effective, powerful first-line diagnostic tool in establishing the molecular diagnosis in adult neurological patients with variable symptoms. Importantly, CES can markedly shorten the diagnostic odysseys of about one third of patients.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:21