A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
The Effect of Consumer-based Activity Tracker Intervention on Physical Activity among Recent Retirees-An RCT Study
Authors: Leskinen Tuija, Suorsa Kristin, Tuominen Miika, Pulakka Anna, Pentti Jaana, Löyttyniemi Eliisa, Heinonen Ilkka, Vahtera Jussi, Stenholm Sari
Publisher: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Publication year: 2021
Journal: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Journal name in source: MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Journal acronym: MED SCI SPORT EXER
Volume: 53
Issue: 8
First page : 1756
Last page: 1765
Number of pages: 10
ISSN: 0195-9131
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002627
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/66674083
Purpose The randomized controlled trial REACT (NCT03320746) examined the effect of a 12-month consumer-based activity tracker intervention on accelerometer-measured physical activity among recent retirees.
Methods Altogether 231 recently retired Finnish adults (age, 65.2 +/- 1.1 yr, mean +/- SD; 83% women) were randomized to intervention and control groups.
Intervention participants were requested to wear a commercial wrist-worn activity tracker (Polar Loop 2; Polar, Kempele, Finland) for 12 months, to try to reach the daily activity goals shown on the tracker display, and to upload their activity data to a Web-based program every week. The control group received no intervention. Accelerometer-based outcome measurements of daily total, light physical activity (LPA), and moderate to vigorous (MVPA) physical activity were conducted at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month time points. Hierarchical linear mixed models were used to examine the differences between the groups over time. All analyses were performed by intention-to-treat principle and adjusted for wake wear time.
Results The use of a commercial activity tracker did not increase daily total activity, LPA, or MVPA over the 12-months period when compared with nonuser controls (group-time interaction, P = 0.39, 0.23, and 0.77, respectively). There was an increase in LPA over the first 6 months in both the intervention (26 min center dot d(-1), 95% confidence interval [CI] = 13 to 39) and the control (14 min center dot d(-1), 95% CI = 1 to 27) groups, but the difference between the groups was not significant (12 min center dot d(-1), 95% CI = -6 to 30). In both groups, LPA decreased from 6 to 12 months.
Conclusion The 12-month use of a commercial activity tracker does not appear to elicit significant changes in the daily total activity among a general population sample of recent retirees, thus highlighting the need to explore other alternatives to increase physical activity in this target group.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |