A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Clinical experience and cost evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging -only workflow in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer




TekijätKeyriläinen Jani, Sjöblom Olli, Turnbull-Smith Sonja, Hovirinta Taru, Minn Heikki

KustantajaElsevier

Julkaisuvuosi2021

JournalPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology

Lehden akronyymiPhys Imaging Radiat Oncol

Vuosikerta19

Aloitussivu66

Lopetussivu71

ISSN2405-6316

eISSN2405-6316

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.07.004

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/66665643


Tiivistelmä

Abstract

Background and purpose
In radiation therapy (RT), significant improvements have been made recently particularly in the practices of planning imaging. This study aimed to conduct a cost evaluation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) -only and combined computed tomography (CT) and MRI workflows.

Materials and methods
The time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) model was used to conduct a cost evaluation between the two workflows in those steps, where cost differences were expected. Costs were divided into capital costs and operational costs. The former consisted of fixed, one-time expenses, e.g. the purchase of a scanner, whereas the latter were partially based on the amount of activity consumed i.e. time required for image acquisition, image registration and structure contouring.

Results
In a review over a period of 10 years for 300 annual prostate cancer patients, the total cost of the workflow steps included in the study for an individual patient applying the MRI-only workflow was 903 € (100%), comprised of 537 € (59%) capital costs and 366 € (41%) operational costs. The corresponding total cost for an individual patient applying the CT + MRI workflow was 922 € (100%), comprised of 197 € (21%) capital costs and 726 € (79%) operational costs. In 10 years for 3000 patients, a total saving of 58,544 € (2%) was achieved with the MRI-only workflow compared with the dual imaging workflow.

Conclusions
MRI-only workflow is a feasible and economic way to perform clinical RT for localized prostate cancer, in particular for medium- and large-sized departments treating a sufficient number of patients.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 18:25