A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Tobacco retailer density and smoking behavior in a rural Australian jurisdiction without a tobacco retailer licensing system
Tekijät: Baker John, Masood Mohd, Rahman Muhammad Aziz, Thornton Lukar, Begg Stephen
Kustantaja: BioMed Central
Julkaisuvuosi: 2021
Journal: Tobacco Induced Diseases
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: Tobacco Induced Diseases
Artikkelin numero: 39
Vuosikerta: 19
ISSN: 1617-9625
eISSN: 1617-9625
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/134190
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/66421988
Introduction:
An emerging body of research has developed around tobacco retailer density and its contribution to smoking behavior. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the association between tobacco retailer density and smoking behavior in a rural Australian jurisdiction without a tobacco retailer licensing system in place.
Methods:
A local government database (updated 2018) of listed tobacco retailers (n=93) was accessed and potential unlisted tobacco retailers (n=230) were added using online searches. All retailers (n=323) were visited in 2019 and GPS coordinates of retailers that sold tobacco (n=125) were assigned to suburbs in ArcMap. A community survey conducted in the Local Government Area provided smoking and sociodemographic data amongst adult respondents (n=8981). Associations between tobacco retailer density (calculated as the number of retailers per km2 based on respondents’ suburb of residence) and daily, occasional and experimental smoking were assessed using multilevel logistic regression analysis. Separate models with and without covariates were undertaken.
Results:
Without adjusting for possible confounders, living in suburbs with greater retailer density did not increase the odds of daily smoking (OR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.92–1.12), occasional smoking (OR=1.05; 95% CI: 0.94–1.18), or experimental smoking (OR=0.98; 95% 0.92– 1.05). However, after adjustment, living in suburbs with greater retailer density increased the odds of occasional smoking behavior (AOR=1.37; 95% CI: 1.10–1.71) but not daily or experimental smoking.
Conclusions:
This study found a significant positive association between tobacco retailer density and the likelihood of occasional smoking in a rural Australian jurisdiction without a tobacco retailer licensing system in place. The findings strengthen calls for the introduction of a comprehensive, positive tobacco retailer licensing system to provide a framework for improving compliance with legislation and to reduce the overall availability of tobacco products in the community.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |