A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Positron emission tomography study of effects of two pressure-relieving support surfaces on pressure ulcer development
Tekijät: Soppi Esa, Knuuti Juhani, Kalliokoski Kari
Kustantaja: MA HEALTHCARE LTD
Julkaisuvuosi: 2021
Journal: Journal of Wound Care
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE
Lehden akronyymi: J WOUND CARE
Vuosikerta: 30
Numero: 1
Aloitussivu: 54
Lopetussivu: 62
Sivujen määrä: 9
ISSN: 0969-0700
eISSN: 2052-2916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.30.1.54
Tiivistelmä
Objective: To study the pathophysiological cascade of pressure ulcer (PU) development consisting of tissue deformation, inflammation and hypoxia.Method: In this crossover study, deformation was measured with computerised tomography (CT) linked with contact area reflecting immersion and envelopment. Inflammation and hypoxia were measured using subepidermal moisture (SEM), skin temperature and tissue perfusion with positron emission tomography. These variables were investigated under 90 minutes of pressure exposure caused by two functionally different support surfaces-a regular foam mattress and a minimum pressure air (MPA) mattress.Results: A total of eight healthy volunteers took part in the study. There was major tissue deformation when the participants lay on a foam mattress while the tissues retained their original shape on the MPA mattress (p<0.0001). During the pressure exposure, the skin temperature increased significantly on both support surfaces but the final temperature on the foam mattress was about 1 degrees C higher than on the M PA mattress (p<0.0001). SEM increased on both support surfaces compared with an unexposed reference site, but the cause may be different between the two support surfaces. Tissue perfusion was lowest in the skin followed by subcutaneous tissues and highest in the muscles. The pressure exposure did not cause any substantial changes in perfusion. The results showed that tissue deformation was more pronounced, the support surface contact area (envelopment), was smaller and the skin temperature higher on the foam mattress than on the MPA mattress, without significant differences in tissue perfusion.Conclusion: In this study, the MPA mattress support surface had mechanobiological properties that counteracted tissue deformation and thereby may prevent PUs.
Objective: To study the pathophysiological cascade of pressure ulcer (PU) development consisting of tissue deformation, inflammation and hypoxia.Method: In this crossover study, deformation was measured with computerised tomography (CT) linked with contact area reflecting immersion and envelopment. Inflammation and hypoxia were measured using subepidermal moisture (SEM), skin temperature and tissue perfusion with positron emission tomography. These variables were investigated under 90 minutes of pressure exposure caused by two functionally different support surfaces-a regular foam mattress and a minimum pressure air (MPA) mattress.Results: A total of eight healthy volunteers took part in the study. There was major tissue deformation when the participants lay on a foam mattress while the tissues retained their original shape on the MPA mattress (p<0.0001). During the pressure exposure, the skin temperature increased significantly on both support surfaces but the final temperature on the foam mattress was about 1 degrees C higher than on the M PA mattress (p<0.0001). SEM increased on both support surfaces compared with an unexposed reference site, but the cause may be different between the two support surfaces. Tissue perfusion was lowest in the skin followed by subcutaneous tissues and highest in the muscles. The pressure exposure did not cause any substantial changes in perfusion. The results showed that tissue deformation was more pronounced, the support surface contact area (envelopment), was smaller and the skin temperature higher on the foam mattress than on the MPA mattress, without significant differences in tissue perfusion.Conclusion: In this study, the MPA mattress support surface had mechanobiological properties that counteracted tissue deformation and thereby may prevent PUs.