A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Positron emission tomography study of effects of two pressure-relieving support surfaces on pressure ulcer development




AuthorsSoppi Esa, Knuuti Juhani, Kalliokoski Kari

PublisherMA HEALTHCARE LTD

Publication year2021

JournalJournal of Wound Care

Journal name in sourceJOURNAL OF WOUND CARE

Journal acronymJ WOUND CARE

Volume30

Issue1

First page 54

Last page62

Number of pages9

ISSN0969-0700

eISSN2052-2916

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.30.1.54


Abstract
Objective: To study the pathophysiological cascade of pressure ulcer (PU) development consisting of tissue deformation, inflammation and hypoxia.Method: In this crossover study, deformation was measured with computerised tomography (CT) linked with contact area reflecting immersion and envelopment. Inflammation and hypoxia were measured using subepidermal moisture (SEM), skin temperature and tissue perfusion with positron emission tomography. These variables were investigated under 90 minutes of pressure exposure caused by two functionally different support surfaces-a regular foam mattress and a minimum pressure air (MPA) mattress.Results: A total of eight healthy volunteers took part in the study. There was major tissue deformation when the participants lay on a foam mattress while the tissues retained their original shape on the MPA mattress (p<0.0001). During the pressure exposure, the skin temperature increased significantly on both support surfaces but the final temperature on the foam mattress was about 1 degrees C higher than on the M PA mattress (p<0.0001). SEM increased on both support surfaces compared with an unexposed reference site, but the cause may be different between the two support surfaces. Tissue perfusion was lowest in the skin followed by subcutaneous tissues and highest in the muscles. The pressure exposure did not cause any substantial changes in perfusion. The results showed that tissue deformation was more pronounced, the support surface contact area (envelopment), was smaller and the skin temperature higher on the foam mattress than on the MPA mattress, without significant differences in tissue perfusion.Conclusion: In this study, the MPA mattress support surface had mechanobiological properties that counteracted tissue deformation and thereby may prevent PUs.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 10:27