A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Same species, different risks: predation shapes hormonal profiles in a breeding sea duck, the common eider;




AuthorsMohring, Bertille; Vakili, Farshad S; Angelier, Frédéric; Jaatinen, Kim; Ruuskanen, Suvi; Chastel, Olivier; Parenteau, Charline; Hsu, Bin-Yan; Peetumber, Titiksha; Arzel, Céline; Öst, Markus

EditorsMadliger Christine

PublisherOxford University Press (OUP)

Publication year2026

Journal: Conservation Physiology

Article numbercoag036

Volume14

Issue1

eISSN2051-1434

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coag036

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coag036

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/527030408

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF

Additional informationThe datasets used in this are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.


Abstract

Prey are predicted to respond to humans as they would to predators. Hence, human disturbance can elicit costly physiological and behavioural antipredator responses. However, human presence can also shelter prey from human-averse predators (the human ‘scarecrow effect’). Whether this ‘scarecrow effect’ reduces perceived predation risk and promotes prey reproductive investment, as predicted by life-history theory, remains unclear. To test this, we monitored complementary hormonal markers in two geographically proximate colonies of common eiders Somateria mollissima breeding under contrasting conditions: one exposed to low human disturbance but high predation risk, and the other to high human disturbance (intense tourism) shielding birds from predators (i.e. low predation risk). We measured proxies of energy expenditure [baseline corticosterone (CORT)] and thyroid hormone levels [triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4)], acute stress response (stress-induced CORT levels) and parental effort [baseline prolactin (PRL) levels]. Hormonal profiles differed markedly between colonies. Eiders in the low-disturbance/high-predation colony displayed higher baseline CORT and T3 levels than those in the high-disturbance/low-predation one, suggesting higher energy expenditure—possibly reflecting a higher energetic cost of incubating under elevated predation pressure. Stress-induced CORT levels were similar across colonies, suggesting that eiders maintain sensitivity to acute stressors despite a human ‘scarecrow effect.’ Supporting the hypothesis of increased parental effort under reduced perceived predation risk, incubating females displayed higher baseline PRL levels in the high-disturbance/low-predation colony. Altogether, these results are consistent with a human ‘scarecrow effect’ that reduces perceived predation risk without diminishing sensitivity to acute stressors, and that is associated with increased reproductive investment. Our research highlights the value of integrating multiple hormonal markers to understand wildlife responses to human disturbance and predation risk.



Keywords:
corticosteroneenergy expenditureHuman disturbanceparental investmentprolactinscarecrow effectSomateria mollissimastress responsethyroid hormonestourism

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This research was supported by the Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland (grant numbers 17/3317, 16/1476, 15/3296, 14/2657, 13/2654, 138139, 149014, 158026, 168333, 177733, 188437 and 200931 to M.Ö.), the Academy of Finland (grant numbers 266208 to K.J., 128039 to M.Ö. and 333400 and 336261 to C.A.), Sophie von Julins Stiftelse (K.J.; grant to the Nature and Game Management Trust Finland) and the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland (K.J.; grant to the Nature and Game Management Trust Finland), grants to F.S.V. from the Finnish Foundation for Nature Conservation, Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica and the Finnish Cultural Foundation (grant number 00241187 Central Fund).


Last updated on 13/08/2026 08:33:53 AM