A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Association between brown adipose tissue activity and clinical outcomes in melanoma: a retrospective PET/CT analysis;




AuthorsToivanen, P.; Ketola, P.; Vahlberg, T.; Virtanen, K.A.; Sundvall, M.; Raiko, J.

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2026

Journal: Immuno-Oncology and Technology

Article number101600

Volume31

eISSN2590-0188

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotech.2026.101600

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotech.2026.101600

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/526926879

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract

Background

Brown adipose tissue (BAT) activity has been suggested to play a role in cancer progression. Previous studies have shown that BAT activity is higher in patients with cancer, and that BAT volume is a predictor of tumour recurrence and mortality in patients with cancer, but the data on melanoma are limited.

Patients and methods

Here, we re-analysed 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG–PET–CT) images from 135 patients with cutaneous melanoma treated at Turku University Hospital between 2012 and 2021 to assess associations among BAT, melanoma progression, patient survival, and patient weight. We applied a three-stage universal BAT threshold definition using predetermined standardised uptake value thresholds of 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 g/ml, given the retrospective nature of our study. Of the 135 patients (81 men and 54 women; median age 61 years, interquartile range 54-71), 40 (29.6%), 24 (17.8%), and 19 (14.1%) were BAT-positive at the 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 g/ml thresholds, respectively.

Results

Our results showed that patients with active melanoma on FDG–PET–CT imaging were more frequently BAT-positive at the 0.8 threshold ( P = 0.026) and 1.0 threshold ( P = 0.016). We also found a significantly higher BAT volume among patients who survived the observation period (0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 g/ml thresholds; P = 0.018, P = 0.038, and P = 0.571, respectively) and those who did not relapse (0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 g/ml thresholds; P = 0.631, P = 0.012, and P = 0.030, respectively).

Conclusions

No association between BAT positivity and relapse-free survival or overall survival was observed at any threshold. Although higher BAT volumes were observed in subgroups of patients who survived or did not relapse, these findings were not supported by survival analyses and should be considered exploratory.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
The work was supported by a grant from the Avohoidon Tutkimussäätiö foundation (no grant number).


Last updated on 05/08/2026 11:29:50 AM