A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Intracranial Human BT12 Glioblastoma Xenograft is [18F]FET PET Negative but 6-[18F]Fluoronicotinic Acid PET Positive: Exploring a Novel Approach for Clinical Glioblastoma Imaging;




AuthorsEkwe, David; Ayo, Abiodun; Zhuang, Xiaoqing; Dillemuth, Pyry; Airenne, Tomi T.; Bakay, Emel; Lövdahl, Petter; Kunnas, Jonne; Bai, Lu; Rajander, Johan; Salminen, Tiina A.; Rosenholm, Jessica M.; Laakkonen, Pirjo; Li, Xiang-Guo

PublisherAmerican Chemical Society (ACS)

Publication year2026

Journal: Molecular Pharmaceutics

Article numberacs.molpharmaceut.6c00279

ISSN1543-8384

eISSN1543-8392

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6c00279

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6c00279

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/526576868

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults with a median survival of less than 2 years. Radiolabeled amino acids like O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) have tremendous value in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of gliomas with positron emission tomography (PET). However, the existence of [18F]FET PET negativity in 10–30% of patients with glioma underscores the need for alternative radiotracers. We recently reported that 6-[18F]fluoronicotinic acid ([18F]FNA) PET can clearly delineate intracranial human glioblastoma xenograft in a mouse model and that monocarboxylate transporters 1 and 2 (MCT1/2) mediate tumor uptake. This study evaluated the potential clinical utility of [18F]FNA by comparing its PET imaging performance with the current clinical amino acid radiotracers, [18F]FET and [11C]methionine ([11C]MET), as benchmarks. Orthotopic human glioblastoma xenograft models were prepared in mice for radiotracer comparisons and MCT blocking studies. Dynamic PET imaging, ex vivo biodistribution, brain tissue autoradiography, and histological staining were performed. In silico docking was also performed to analyze the interactions between MCT1 and FNA. The tumor was distinctly visualized on PET with [18F]FNA, whereas [18F]FET did not provide discernible tumor images in the same mice. Despite the negative [18F]FET PET results, the tumor was [11C]MET PET positive. In vivo blocking experiments indicated that MCT1, MCT2, and MCT4 are important transporters but may contribute in unequal measures to [18F]FNA tissue uptake. In vivo blocking with AZD3965, a dual inhibitor of MCT1 and MCT2, reduced [18F]FNA tumor uptake by 68–77%, while blocking MCT4 reduced uptake by 23%. In silico analysis supports ligand–protein interaction between FNA and MCT1. We were not able to visualize the human glioblastoma xenografts in mice by [18F]FET PET, but tumor uptake was detected with [18F]FNA and [11C]MET PET. MCT1, MCT2, and MCT4 have significant roles in [18F]FNA uptake in glioblastoma and other tissues. [18F]FNA could be an alternative approach for clinical PET imaging of glioblastoma based on a biological mechanism completely different from current clinical approaches.


Funding information in the publication
We acknowledge research support from the Research Council of Finland (#368560, #352727, #352823), Finnish Cancer Foundation, Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, Finnish Cultural Foundation, Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation, and the State Research Funding of Turku University Hospital (#11009). This research was partially supported by the Research Council of Finland’s Flagship InFLAMES (#337531, #337530, #359346, #357911, and #357910), and the European Union – NextGenerationEU instrument. David Ekwe is grateful for a study grant from the Doctoral program on Drug Research and Diagnostics at the University of Turku, Finland.


Last updated on 18/06/2026 07:35:32 AM