A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Predictive validity of Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test – Consumption (AUDIT‐C) for register‐based alcohol‐attributable events among general‐population men and women of different ages;




AuthorsMäkelä, Pia; Reinikainen, Jaakko; Callinan, Sarah; Jääskeläinen, Marke; Kuurne, Kaisa; Lintonen, Tomi; Niemelä, Solja; Levola, Jonna

PublisherWiley

Publication year2026

Journal: Addiction

Article numberadd.70473

ISSN0965-2140

eISSN1360-0443

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/add.70473

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70473

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/526536674

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY NC

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract

Background and aims: Originally developed for clinical screening for hazardous alcohol use, the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test - Consumption (AUDIT-C) is also widely used in epidemiological research and monitoring. However, its cutoff values may not suit all purposes, and evidence on its predictive validity is limited. We examined how AUDIT-C scores relate to subsequent register-based alcohol-attributable events across age and sex and identified optimal thresholds for predicting these outcomes.

Design: Five general population surveys conducted in 2011-2017, linked to nationwide registers with follow-up until the end of 2023 (total follow-up 879 964 person-years).

Setting: Nationwide, Finland.

Participants: Adults aged ≥20 years (n = 103 567).

Measurements: AUDIT-C to assess exposure.

Outcome: incident alcohol-attributable events in any of the registers capturing care, deaths and prescription medicines (n = 1444).

Findings: The hazard of register-based alcohol-attributable events increased approximately exponentially with increasing AUDIT-C score. It rose more strongly among women than men [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.55-1.67 for women; HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.40-1.49 for men; P < 0.001 for the sex × AUDIT-C interaction]. The risk of alcohol-attributable events was statistically significantly raised at 2 points among women and 3 points among men with 1 point as a reference level. The suggested optimal cutoff values were 2 points for women aged ≥80, 3 points for women aged 65-79 and men aged ≥80, 5 points for women aged 20-64 and men aged 65-79 and 6 points for men aged 20-64.

Conclusions: Using Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test - Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores, optimal cutoff values for predicting alcohol-attributable harm may differ by age and sex, with lower cutoffs for older individuals and women. The ≥65 age group appears to be heterogeneous with regard to vulnerability to alcohol-attributable harm, which should be considered when establishing cutoffs or guidelines for alcohol use.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Analyses and writing was supported by the Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation.


Last updated on 15/06/2026 10:06:00 AM