B1 Vertaisarvioitu muu artikkeli (esim. pääkirjoitus, letter, comment) tieteellisessä lehdessä
Beyond group averages: why motor control studies must address population and individual heterogeneity; 
Tekijät: Rudroff, Thorsten
Kustantaja: American Physiological Society
Julkaisuvuosi: 2026
Lehti: Journal of Neurophysiology
Vuosikerta: 135
Numero: 6
Aloitussivu: 1451
Lopetussivu: 1452
ISSN: 0022-3077
eISSN: 1522-1598
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00021.2026
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00021.2026
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/526534601
Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssi: CC BY
Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versio: Kustantajan versio
TO THE EDITOR: Kim et al. (1) make an important conceptual contribution by distinguishing force variability from force smoothness during isometric contractions, demonstrating that these metrics respond differently to visual gain manipulation. However, the study suffers from two fundamental problems that undermine its scientific validity: 1) a demographically opaque convenience sample of 14 participants presented as revealing universal principles of human motor control, and 2) visible individual heterogeneity in the data that is completely ignored in favor of group averages. These issues exemplify what I term the “dual diversity crisis” in neuroscience research—the simultaneous neglect of both population diversity and brain diversity.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
