A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Quality of life in children and adults with epidermolysis bullosa: the QoL-REB explorative study
Tekijät: Pilo, Cinzia; Benedan, Laura; Morra, Valentina; Hachem, May El; Tadini, Gianluca; Annicchiarico, Giuseppina; Brena, Michela; Guez, Sophie; Lospalluti, Lucia; Mariani Wigley, Isabella L. C.; Provenzi, Livio; Mariani, Paolo; Barello, Serena
Kustantaja: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Julkaisuvuosi: 2026
Lehti: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Artikkelin numero: 181
Vuosikerta: 21
Numero: 1
eISSN: 1750-1172
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-026-04321-6
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-026-04321-6
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/523610676
Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssi: CC BY
Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versio: Kustantajan versio
Background: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare inherited disorder characterized by skin and mucosal fragility, with severe implications for physical, psychological, and social well-being. Research on quality of life (QoL) in EB remains limited, particularly in Italy, where systematic patient-reported outcome measures are lacking. To address this gap, Fondazione REB ETS developed a patient-centered QoL questionnaire (QoL-REB) constructed directly by patients and caregivers, with support from clinicians and researchers.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey between March and April 2024, recruiting Italian EB patients and caregivers through Fondazione REB and Debra Italia mailing lists. Participants completed the QoL-REB questionnaire, which assesses seven dimensions of QoL: physical health, autonomy, emotional well-being, family dynamics, social interactions, work/school life, and care experience. Responses were rated on a 4-point scale, with overall QoL assessed on a 0-10 scale.
Results: Forty-seven individuals with EB (38 adults, 9 minors; 55% female) participated, representing multiple EB subtypes, predominantly dystrophic EB (62.4%). Mean overall QoL was rated 6/10. Pain, itching, and reduced mobility emerged as the most frequent physical challenges. Over 70% of adults reported limited autonomy in daily activities, while children experienced difficulties with walking, dressing, and sports participation. Emotional distress was common, with patients expressing concerns about future prospects, body image, and dependence on others; 43% reported a need for psychological support. Family burden was evident, with both adults and minors perceiving themselves as a strain on relatives. Social limitations, workplace and school difficulties, and dissatisfaction with healthcare services-particularly a lack of EB-specific expertise in non-reference centers-were also reported.
Conclusions: This first Italian patient-led assessment highlights the pervasive and multidimensional burden of EB on QoL. Findings underscore the need for integrated, patient-centered care models that combine medical, psychological, and social support. The QoL-REB questionnaire provides a novel, comprehensive tool to capture the lived experience of EB and may serve as a framework for international adaptation and implementation.
Keywords: Epidermolysis bullosa; Patient-centered research; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life; Rare diseases.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This work was supported by Fondazione REB under the grant agreement QoL-REB, as part of the "Quality of Life REB" project. During the first year, the initiative received additional financial support from Molnlycke and Chiesi through Fondazione REB; in subsequent years, it was funded directly by Fondazione REB from its own resources. Fondazione REB - particularly through the involvement of its former President, Cinzia Pilo - contributed to the conception and development of the project and to manuscript preparation, but had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data.