A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Effect of Cu-Fe-Co Catalyst Pretreatment in Higher Alcohol Synthesis




TekijätAho, Atte; Simakova, Irina; Sandri, Francesco; Peuronen, Anssi; Lindberg, Daniel; Mäki-Arvela, Päivi; Eränen, Kari; Lastusaari, Mika; Murzin, Dmitry Yu

KustantajaSpringer Nature

Julkaisuvuosi2026

Lehti: Topics in Catalysis

ISSN1022-5528

eISSN1572-9028

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-026-02289-y

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11244-026-02289-y

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/523355305

Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssiCC BY

Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versioKustantajan versio


Tiivistelmä

Higher alcohol synthesis was carried out over a CuFeCoK/SiO2 catalyst with the focus on catalyst pretreatment methods. These methods consisted of either reduction with hydrogen, or reduction followed by low temperature carburization with CO, all at 300 °C. Furthermore, a third method was applied without any pretreatment of the catalyst. It was found that the pretreatment using both reduction and carburization gave the most active catalyst in terms of CO conversion within the temperature range tested, 225–300 °C. The apparent activation energy for CO conversion was calculated to be ca. 79 kJ/mol for different pretreatment methods. The pretreatments influenced the product distribution in a way that more alkenes were formed with the reduced and carburized catalyst compared to the catalysts pretreated with the other procedures, while the selectivity to CO2 was the highest for the only reduced catalyst. The highest selectivity (58.5%) to alcohols was achieved with the un-pretreated catalyst although at the lowest CO conversion, being as low as 4.3% at 225 °C. No catalyst deactivation was observed during testing of the catalysts up to 100 h time on stream independent of the pretreatment method. The theoretical equilibrium compositions was calculated for the different pretreatment methods and compared with catalyst characterisation results.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
Open access funding provided by Åbo Akademi University.


Last updated on