A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Predictors of Outcomes of Parent Training Targeting Disruptive Behavior in Children Aged 4 Years at 6-Month Follow-Up: Results From a Large Prospective Cohort Implementation Study




TekijätWesterlund, Minja; Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki, Susanna; Ristkari, Terja; Kinnunen, Malin; Baumel, Amit; Sourander, Andre

KustantajaJMIR Publications Inc.

Julkaisuvuosi2026

Lehti: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Artikkelin numeroe79592

Vuosikerta28

ISSN1439-4456

eISSN1438-8871

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2196/79592

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.2196/79592

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/523302759

Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssiCC BY

Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versioKustantajan versio


Tiivistelmä

Background:Parent training interventions effectively reduce disruptive behavior in children. However, research on how participant characteristics and program factors influence the outcomes in real-world settings remains scarce.

Objective:This study aimed to identify factors predicting outcomes of the internet-based, telephone-assisted Strongest Families Parent training program.

Methods:A prospective cohort implementation study conducted within population-based screening embedded in routine health checkups targeting all children aged 4 years in Finland, to identify children with high levels of conduct problems and functional impairment. From a study population of 49,504, altogether 3911 participants completed baseline measures, 707 participants did not do so at 6 months follow-up, resulting in a sample of 3204 (1158/3186, 36.3% girl, 2028/3186, 63.7% boys). Reported duration of difficulties was 6 months in 29.57% (934/3159) of participants, 6‐12 months in 27% (853/3159) of participants, and >12 months in 43.43% (1372/3159) of participants. Most children lived with 2 biological parents (2721/3194, 85.19%). A total of 35.24% (1121/3181) of mothers and 26.18% (797/3044) of fathers had a university degree. Data was collected via parent report. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify which child-, family-, and program-related factors predicted changes in the Child Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 (CBCL) externalizing subscale from baseline to 6-month follow-up. The standardized change in CBCL externalizing score was created by subtracting the mean at baseline from the individual 6-month measurement, divided by the SD at baseline. The standardized change was categorized to ±0.5 SD (no change); +0.5 to +1.5 SD (moderate improvement), >+1.5 SD (large improvement), and more than −0.5 SD (deterioration). A P value of <.05 was considered significant.

Results:In 77% (2468/3204) of participants, symptoms improved at 6-month follow-up. Multinomial logistic regression analyses with α-level of <0.05 showed that >12 months duration of initial problems, callous-unemotional traits, and CBCL internalizing symptoms were linked to lower likelihood of large improvement (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.33‐0.56; P<.001; OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57‐0.73; P<.001; OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47‐0.63; P<.001, respectively). Definite and severe problems at baseline were linked to deterioration (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.62‐3.24; P<.001; OR 4.38, 95% CI 2.80‐6.85; P<.001, respectively). Parental stress was linked to a lower likelihood of large improvement (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67‐0.91; P=.002), and anxiety to a higher likelihood of deterioration (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04‐1.39; P=.02).

Conclusions:Children with longer-term and more severe behavioral symptoms may require tailored intervention. Support for parents with stress may be recommended. Much of the current literature on parent training is based on randomized controlled trials, while the literature on the implementation of parenting programs and studies examining change is limited. Our study informs about predictors of treatment outcomes when interventions are implemented. These results are important clinically as they allow personalization of interventions.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This research was supported by the Research Council of Finland (decision number: 345546). This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 101020767; ERC Advanced, AS). The funder had no involvement in this study's design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or the writing of this paper.


Last updated on