A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Levodopa Use and Long‐Term Benefit in Different Dystonia Phenotypes




AuthorsOrtiz, Rebekka M.; Honkaniemi, Jari

EditorsSala Gessica

PublisherWiley

Publication year2026

Journal: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Article number8089933

Volume2026

ISSN0001-6314

eISSN1600-0404

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1155/ane/8089933

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1155/ane/8089933

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/523296338

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract
Background

Dopaminergic changes have been reported in various forms of dystonia beyond dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD). Besides DRD, levodopa (LDopa) is generally not considered effective in dystonia and may worsen it. This study assesses the impact of LDopa on different dystonia phenotypes.

Objectives

The patient database of Tampere University Hospital was screened with data mining over a 5-year period to identify individuals with dystonia who had been prescribed LDopa and was evaluated for the possible long-term responsiveness of LDopa in different dystonia phenotypes.

Methods

The patient database was screened using data mining to identify dystonia patients associated with LDopa over a 5-year period. Clinical information and response to LDopa were evaluated.

Results

LDopa was considered beneficial with 32 of 71 patients. All DRD patients had long-term benefit of LDopa, as well as 44% generalized dystonia patients and 25% segmental dystonia patients, but none of the focal dystonia patients. Of the seven patients with functional dystonia, four considered LDopa originally beneficial, but the effect was temporary with two patients, resulting in elevating LDopa doses. LDopa benefit was associated positively with lower limb dystonia (OR 7.0, p = 0.002) and negatively with cervical dystonia (OR 0.2, p = 0.001). Moreover, long-term LDopa benefit had a significant correlation with unspecified stiffness (OR 4.0, p = 0.014) and walking difficulties (OR 3.8, p = 0.022).

Conclusions

Other than DRD, LDopa should only be considered in generalized dystonia patients with lower limb dystonia and walking difficulties. Objective estimation of symptoms should be conducted if considering LDopa treatment.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Open access publishing was facilitated by Tampereen yliopisto ja Tampereen ammattikorkeakoulu, as part of the Wiley—FinELib agreement.


Last updated on 12/05/2026 08:33:09 AM