A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Governing Positive Energy Districts: The Role of Legitimation and Identity Across Residential and Industrial Contexts




AuthorsValta, Jussi; Vanhanen, Tuomas; Joensuu, Tuomo; Mäkinen, Saku

PublisherWiley

Publication year2026

Journal: Environmental Policy and Governance

Article numbereet.70081

ISSN1756-932X

eISSN1756-9338

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70081

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70081

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/523203538

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract

Increasing electricity demand from data centres, industrial applications, electric vehicles and domestic heating is creating pressure to develop electricity systems in many parts of the world, but especially in Western countries. In response to challenges such as grid congestion, interconnection queues and climate-related hazards, network operators, municipalities and entrepreneurs are turning their attention to local solutions. Positive energy districts (PEDs) are emerging as a prominent new organisational model to implement these solutions. The main objective of a PED is to achieve net-zero emissions on an annual basis, which requires investments in local energy production and its flexible use. However, their success is not guaranteed, as they must overcome the 'liability of newness'. PEDs require strong policy support and a shared understanding among diverse stakeholders, who often have conflicting business objectives and interests. This article examines the legitimation processes of four distinct frontrunner PED projects in Finland and qualitatively analyses the challenges associated with their legitimation. Drawing on the ecosystem literature on legitimacy, we categorise legitimation efforts into identity creation, discursive legitimation and performative legitimation. The qualitative case analysis reveals that the primary legitimation challenges facing PEDs can be distilled into four identity-creation dilemmas: (1) differentiation versus conformity in relationships with energy incumbents; (2) holistic versus focused scope; (3) top-down versus bottom-up governance; (4) balancing timescales and uncertainties through stability versus innovation. This paper contributes to the literature in two main ways. First, it explores the challenges that PEDs face in legitimising themselves. Second, it compares legitimation dynamics across industrial and residential PED contexts. The findings enhance our understanding of PED creation processes and can inform the development of more effective policy support to facilitate their diffusion.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This work was supported by the ECADEC project, which received funding from Business Finland (grant number 8852/31/2022) and the 2IMatch project, which received funding from the Strategic Research Council at the Research Council of Finland (grant 358648).


Last updated on 06/05/2026 02:11:10 PM