A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Intracapsular vs Extracapsular Tonsillectomy Recovery Time
Tekijät: Uusitalo, Tapani; Sjöblom, Henrik; Ivaska, Lotta E.; Kauko, Tommi; Kokki, Hannu; Mansikka, Iisa; Kytö, Eero; Piitulainen, Jaakko
Kustantaja: American Medical Association (AMA)
Julkaisuvuosi: 2026
Lehti: JAMA Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 2168-6181
eISSN: 2168-619X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2026.0284
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Ei avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Osittain avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2026.0284
Importance
Morbidity after traditional extracapsular tonsillectomy (ECTE) is high in adolescents and adults. Alternatively, intracapsular tonsillectomy (ICTE) may have a similar efficacy and reduce postoperative morbidity.
Objective
To investigate the recovery time and morbidity after ICTE compared to ECTE in 16- to 65-year-olds with recurrent or chronic tonsillitis.
Design, Setting, and Participants
The FINITE randomized, patient-blinded, 3-arm clinical trial compared ECTE, intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy (ICTEc), and intracapsular microdebrider tonsillectomy (ICTEm) in the treatment of patients aged 16 to 65 years with recurrent and chronic tonsillitis. The trial was conducted from September 2019 to January 2023 with a 1-month follow-up. The study was conducted at 1 secondary and 1 tertiary hospital in Finland. The data were analyzed between January 2023 and January 2025.
Interventions
The ECTE vs ICTEc vs ICTEm ratio was 1:1:1.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The main outcome was postoperative recovery time. The clinically significant difference between groups in recovery time was predefined to be 3 days favoring the ICTE groups.
Results
A total of 366 patients, aged 16 to 65 years who were diagnosed with recurrent or chronic tonsillitis and scheduled for tonsillectomy, were eligible for inclusion in the FINITE study. After exclusions, 179 patients were randomized (mean [SD] age, 26.7 [8.8] years; 39 [22%] male and 138 [78%] female), and 161 patients (94%) completed the 1-month follow-up. The mean (SD) postoperative recovery time was similar in the 3 groups: 12.1 (4.7) days in the ECTE group, 11.1 (4.6) days in the ICTEc group, and 10.3 (4.6) days in the ICTEm group. In the secondary outcome analysis, swallowing pain intensity was lower in the ICTEc and ICTEm group compared to the ECTE group during postoperative days 1 to 10 and 12, and days 2 to 12, respectively. Daily activity impairment due to pain interference resolved faster in the ICTE groups.
Conclusions and Relevance
In patients aged 16 to 65 years with recurrent or chronic tonsillitis who participated in this randomized clinical trial, recovery times of ICTE and ECTE did not differ to statistical significance. ICTE resulted in a lower pain intensity and faster resolution of pain interference compared to ECTE.
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This study was supported by the Finnish ORL-HNS Foundation, the Sakari Alhopuro Foundation, The Finnish Medical Foundation, the Turku University Central Hospital foundation, and from State Research Funding awarded to Turku University Hospital.