Bacterial screening of platelet donations in England, 2014-2023




Chugh, Vidushi; Secret, Shannah; Davison, Katy; John, Autumn St; Simmonds, Peter; Brailsford, Susan R.; Harvala, Heli

2026

 Vox Sanguinis

0042-9007

1423-0410

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70253

https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70253

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/522980837



Background and Objectives

Bacterial contamination of blood components is an ongoing problem in transfusion medicine. We analysed the bacterial screening data of platelets from England, 2014–2023, and compared this with data on reported near-misses and transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs).

Materials and Methods

Anonymized data on bacterial screening of pooled and apheresis platelet donations were reviewed, including the number of donations collected yearly, results from bacterial screening and time from sampling to detection. The findings were compared with data on near-misses and TTIs reported during the same period.

Results

Screening of 1249,513 apheresis and 1,495,707 pooled platelet donations identified bacterial contamination in 2949 donations, including 78 bacterial species. Over four-fold higher frequency of confirmed bacterial contamination was observed in pooled platelets compared to apheresis donations (0.09% [1096/1,249,513] vs. 0.02% [362/1,495,707], p < 0.0001). Rates of bacterial contamination of pooled platelet doubled during the study period. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly detected highly pathogenic bacterial contaminant (29/147, 19.7%; 15/29, 52% in apheresis platelets). It was also implicated in 1 confirmed case of bacterial TTI and in 8 of 10 reported bacterial near-miss cases.

Conclusion

Increasing frequencies of bacterial contamination, mostly related to skin flora, were noted in pooled platelets. Furthermore, S. aureus was notably associated with near-miss events. Our findings demonstrate a limitation of bacterial screening, with evidence of bacterial growth after platelets were likely supplied for clinical use.


This work was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (grant number NIHR203338). The funding body had no role in the study's design, data collection, analysis or manuscript writing.


Last updated on 23/04/2026 01:59:29 PM