A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Quantitative Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden From CCTA and the Benefit From Lipid-Lowering Medication
Tekijät: Maaniitty, Teemu; Bär, Sarah; Bax, Jeroen J.; Knuuti, Juhani; Saraste, Antti
Julkaisuvuosi: 2026
Lehti: Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Artikkelin numero: e018840
Vuosikerta: 19
Numero: 4
ISSN: 1941-9651
eISSN: 1942-0080
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018840
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Osittain avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.125.018840
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/522952753
Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssi: CC BY
Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versio: Kustantajan versio
BACKGROUND:
We hypothesized that quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden by artificial intelligence-guided quantitative computed tomography can identify patients who derive outcome benefit from lipid-lowering medication (LLM).
METHODS:In this observational cohort study, consecutive symptomatic patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were assessed for percent atheroma volume (PAV) by artificial intelligence-guided quantitative computed tomography. The use of LLM was assessed based on drug purchase registry data within 6 months after coronary computed tomography angiography. Patients were followed for the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina for a median of 6.9 years.
RESULTS:Among 2269 patients (median age, 63 years; 42% men), 1261 (56%) patients used LLM after coronary computed tomography angiography, and 255 (11%) experienced the composite end point during follow-up. The median PAV was 6.6% among users and 1.4% among nonusers of LLM (P<0.001). Adapting the previously proposed CAD stages for artificial intelligence-guided quantitative computed tomography, the use of LLM (versus no use) was associated with improved outcomes among the 910 patients with PAV >5% (annual event rate, 2.62% versus 4.14%; adjusted P=0.002), even in the absence of obstructive CAD, but not among the 1359 patients with PAV ≤5% (annual event rate, 0.94% versus 0.65%; adjusted P=0.717). An adjusted Cox regression analysis, including interaction between PAV and LLM, suggested a PAV threshold between 4% and 10% for gaining prognostic benefit from LLM.
CONCLUSIONS:In symptomatic patients with suspected CAD, LLM after coronary computed tomography angiography was associated with a lower rate of adverse events during long-term follow-up among those with PAV >5%, even in the absence of obstructive CAD. The quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden is a potential marker to guide preventive lipid-lowering therapy.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |