A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Quantitative Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden From CCTA and the Benefit From Lipid-Lowering Medication




AuthorsMaaniitty, Teemu; Bär, Sarah; Bax, Jeroen J.; Knuuti, Juhani; Saraste, Antti

Publication year2026

Journal: Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

Article numbere018840

Volume19

Issue4

ISSN1941-9651

eISSN1942-0080

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018840

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.125.018840

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/522952753

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract
BACKGROUND:

We hypothesized that quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden by artificial intelligence-guided quantitative computed tomography can identify patients who derive outcome benefit from lipid-lowering medication (LLM).

METHODS:

In this observational cohort study, consecutive symptomatic patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were assessed for percent atheroma volume (PAV) by artificial intelligence-guided quantitative computed tomography. The use of LLM was assessed based on drug purchase registry data within 6 months after coronary computed tomography angiography. Patients were followed for the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina for a median of 6.9 years.

RESULTS:

Among 2269 patients (median age, 63 years; 42% men), 1261 (56%) patients used LLM after coronary computed tomography angiography, and 255 (11%) experienced the composite end point during follow-up. The median PAV was 6.6% among users and 1.4% among nonusers of LLM (P<0.001). Adapting the previously proposed CAD stages for artificial intelligence-guided quantitative computed tomography, the use of LLM (versus no use) was associated with improved outcomes among the 910 patients with PAV >5% (annual event rate, 2.62% versus 4.14%; adjusted P=0.002), even in the absence of obstructive CAD, but not among the 1359 patients with PAV ≤5% (annual event rate, 0.94% versus 0.65%; adjusted P=0.717). An adjusted Cox regression analysis, including interaction between PAV and LLM, suggested a PAV threshold between 4% and 10% for gaining prognostic benefit from LLM.

CONCLUSIONS:

In symptomatic patients with suspected CAD, LLM after coronary computed tomography angiography was associated with a lower rate of adverse events during long-term follow-up among those with PAV >5%, even in the absence of obstructive CAD. The quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden is a potential marker to guide preventive lipid-lowering therapy.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 22/04/2026 08:50:40 AM