A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main stenosis: 10-year final results from the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority NOBLE trial




AuthorsNielsen Holck, Emil; Holm, Niels R.; Hildick-Smith, David; Lindsay, M. Mitchell; Spence, Mark S.; Erglis, Andrejs; Menown, Ian B. A.; Steigen, Terje; Hune Mogensen, Lone Juul; Modrau, Ivy Susanne; Niemelä, Matti; Lassen, Jens F.; Oldroyd, Keith; Stradins, Peteris; Walsh, Simon J.; Endresen, Petter C.; Trovik, Thor; Fröbert, Ole; Graham, Alastair N. J.; Anttila, Vesa; Trivedi, Uday; Thuesen, Leif; Christiansen, Evald H.

Publication year2026

Journal: Lancet

Volume407

Issue10536

First page 1374

Last page1382

ISSN0140-6736

eISSN1474-547X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00205-9

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingNo Open Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(26)00205-9


Abstract
Background

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is recommended over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with significant unprotected left main coronary artery disease. We aim to provide long-term outcome data comparing PCI with newer generation drug-eluting stents and CABG, which are scarce.

Methods

This previously published, prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis at 36 hospitals in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Eligibility was determined by a multidisciplinary heart team and defined by clinical criteria (chronic or acute coronary syndrome and a life expectancy of >1 year) and angiographic criteria (left main coronary artery diameter stenosis ≥50% or fractional flow reserve ≤0·80 in the left main ostium, mid-shaft, or bifurcation). Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction within 24 h or considered at too high risk for CABG or PCI were excluded. Patients with angiographically confirmed significant left main coronary artery disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to PCI or CABG using an online system and stratified by site, sex, distal left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions, and diabetes. The primary outcome was the difference in 10-year all-cause mortality in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, which was analysed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and unadjusted Cox regression. Patients were censored at the date of death, emigration, withdrawal, or loss to follow-up. Variation in all-cause mortality was assessed in prespecified subgroups. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01496651 (active, not recruiting).

Findings

From Dec 9, 2008, to Jan 21, 2015, 1201 patients were randomly assigned to PCI (n=598) or CABG (n=603). 17 patients were lost to follow-up before 1 year. 592 patients in each group were included in the ITT population. Mean age was 66·2 years (SD 9·9) in the PCI group and 66·2 years (9·4) in the CABG group. 256 (22%) of 1184 participants were female and 928 (78%) were male. There was no difference in all-cause mortality at 10 years (136 [23%] of 592 in the PCI group and 145 [25%] of 592 in the CABG group; hazard ratio 0·93 [95% CI 0·74–1·18]; p=0·56). No significant difference in all-cause mortality with SYNTAX score was identified.

Interpretation

There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 10 years between PCI and CABG for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease and no additional complex lesions, indicating that PCI is equally as safe as CABG in patients eligible for both treatments. These results will aid heart teams in developing an individualised patient-centred strategy.


Funding information in the publication
This study was funded by Biosensors and Aarhus University Hospital and participating sites.


Last updated on 22/04/2026 08:15:39 AM