A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Polarization in Nursing—Interview Study with Nurse Leaders and Nurses
Tekijät: Karikumpu, Venla; Wikström, Kaisa; Nurmeksela, Anu; Hult, Marja
Julkaisuvuosi: 2026
Lehti: SAGE Open Nursing
Artikkelin numero: 23779608261421735
Vuosikerta: 12
eISSN: 2377-9608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608261421735
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608261421735
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/522928397
Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssi: CC BY
Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versio: Kustantajan versio
Background
Polarization, defined as the division of a group into two distinct and opposing sides, has become increasingly evident in nursing. This phenomenon may negatively affect staff well-being and create significant challenges for nursing management.
AimTo explore nurse leaders’ and nurses’ experiences and definitions of polarization in nursing practice.
DesignA qualitative study using thematic interviews analyzed through inductive content analysis.
Participants and ContextData were collected in 2023 from nurse leaders (n = 17) through focus group interviews and nurses (n = 26) through individual interviews.
Ethical ConsiderationsThe study adhered to ethical research principles. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained from the relevant trade union prior to data collection. All participants provided informed consent.
FindingsBoth nurse leaders and nurses perceived nursing as polarized and deeply embedded in everyday practice. Polarization manifested through diverging individuality, siloed work units, organizational structures, and pressing societal challenges. Diverging individuality was linked to personal preparedness and demographic factors, while siloed work units reflected divisions within work communities. Organizational structures were shaped by sector-specific characteristics and employment relationships. Societal challenges included differing positions on multiculturalism, geographical disparities, and other contextual factors.
ConclusionsPolarization in nursing emerges from individual, organizational, and societal dimensions. Nurse leaders primarily interpret polarization through organizational challenges, such as role conflicts and work community dynamics, whereas nurses experience it more at the individual level, for example, through reward systems. Addressing both perspectives is essential for identifying, mitigating, and preventing polarization. Understanding its multidimensional nature enables nurse leaders to implement strategies that foster inclusivity and collaboration, ultimately enhancing staff well-being, improving patient care, and strengthening organizational performance.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This study was funded by the Finnish Work Environment Fund (grant no 230355).