A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Screening and treatment practices for tuberculosis infection in Nordic, Baltic and Central European countries and Ukraine in 2023




TekijätFeuth, Thijs; Rajalahti, Iiris; Vauhkonen, Mikko; Nordstrand, Karine; Stecher, Melanie; Viiklepp, Piret; Gurbanova, Elmira; Nurm, Ülla-Karin; Terleeva, Yana; Vasankari, Tuula

Julkaisuvuosi2026

Lehti: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

ISSN0934-9723

eISSN1435-4373

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-026-05471-y

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-026-05471-y

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/522865305

Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssiCC BY

Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versioKustantajan versio


Tiivistelmä
Purpose

Throughout Europe, tuberculosis (TB) remains a public health concern, particularly among high-risk groups. Identifying at-risk populations for tuberculosis infection (TBI) testing and treatment is one of the tools to control the TB epidemic. This study aims to assess policies and practices in tuberculosis infection management across 10 countries in the Nordic, Baltic and Central European region, collaborating through the Northern Dimension Partnership in Public Health and Social Well-being network (NDPHS), and Ukraine.

Methods

National data on TB epidemiology, management and policies were collected through an online questionnaire, followed by structured interviews with country representatives. Data were verified and meaningful similarities and differences were identified through follow-up contacts and working group discussions.

Results

Among NDPHS countries, TB incidence ranged from 3 to 22 per 100,000 population in 2023, with multidrug resistance in 4.1% (441/10855) of cases. In NDPHS countries, Ukrainians accounted for 46.4% (189/407) of multidrug-resistant cases. While all countries screen for TBI among immunosuppressed patients and TB contacts, approaches to refugee screening and preventive treatment vary, 5 of 11 countries lacked access to rifapentine. Most countries did not utilize levofloxacin in the preventive treatment of multidrug-resistant TBI. Two countries reported having a national registry for TBI.

Conclusion

Significant variation exists in TBI management across countries. Optimizing screening and treatment strategies directed at populations at risk is crucial for TB control in low-incidence countries. Cross-border coordination could be improved through alignment with international guidelines and by establishing an international registry for TBI.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
Open Access funding provided by University of Turku (including Turku University Central Hospital). The study was funded by the Norwegian Ministry for Health and Care Services.


Last updated on