A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Combined Anatomic and Functional Testing Identifies Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Who Benefit From Revascularization




AuthorsPedersen, Oliver Buchhave; Rasmussen, Laust Dupont; Søby, Jacob Hartmann; Gormsen, Lars C.; Christiansen, Evald Høj; Knuuti, Juhani; Bøttcher, Morten; Shaw, Leslee; Winther, Simon

Publication year2026

Journal: Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

Article numbere019267

ISSN1941-9651

eISSN1942-0080

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.019267

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingNo Open Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.125.019267


Abstract
BACKGROUND:

In patients with obstructive coronary artery disease, early revascularization does not improve outcomes but may reduce angina symptoms. The objective of this study was to examine whether changes in health status outcomes following revascularization are explained by the extent of myocardial perfusion defects and improvement in myocardial perfusion.

METHODS:

Two trials enrolling stable patients with new-onset chest pain suggestive of obstructive coronary artery disease, the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) and the Dan-NICAD (Danish Study of Noninvasive Testing in Coronary Artery Disease) trials, were analyzed. Patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease who underwent nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (nMPI) were included. In the ISCHEMIA trial, patients with moderate/severe ischemia were randomized to either optimal medical therapy alone or optimal medical therapy and invasive angiography. The Dan-NICAD trial enrolled patients with suspected stenosis on coronary computed tomographic angiography undergoing nMPI. Test-guided revascularization blinded to nMPI was performed, and patients with initially abnormal nMPI were reassessed after 12 months. The primary outcome was the change in the Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score.

RESULTS:

In total, 584 patients were eligible. In patients with a summed difference score of 5≤10 (n=149 [25%]) and ≥10 (n=152 [26%]), revascularization was associated with an improved angina frequency score (mean change ±SD: 16.4±20.9 and 19.0±24.1). No improvement was demonstrated in patients with a summed difference score <5. In multivariable logistic regression analysis (n=91), an increase in hyperemic myocardial blood flow at follow-up was associated with freedom from angina (odds ratio, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.04–8.70]).

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease, nMPI may identify patients more likely to experience improved symptoms from revascularization, potentially reflecting enhanced myocardial perfusion.


Funding information in the publication
Dr Rasmussen acknowledges support from Danish Cardiovascular Academy, (grant number PD5Y-2023001-DCA) which is funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF20SA0067242) and the Danish Heart Foundation. Dr Bøttcher has been a member of advisory boards and has had research collaborations with Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, BMS-Pfizer, and Acarix. Dr Winther has received support from the Novo Nordisk Foundation Clinical Emerging Investigator grant (NNF21OC0066981). Dr Knuuti has financial support from Research Council of Finland, Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, Finnish State Research Funding, and InFlames Flagship, Finland, and consultant fees from GE Healthcare and Synektik, and speaker fees from Siemens. The other authors report no conflicts.


Last updated on 15/04/2026 09:05:33 AM