A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced voiding ultrasonography and direct radionuclide cystography with physiologic bladder filling volumes in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux—a prospective study




TekijätViljamaa, Hanna-Reeta; Laurikainen, Tiina; Pakkasjärvi, Niklas A.; Seppänen, Marko; Rautava, Päivi T. K.; Ripatti, Liisi L. M.

KustantajaSpringer Science and Business Media LLC

Julkaisuvuosi2026

Lehti: European Journal of Pediatrics

Artikkelin numero181

Vuosikerta185

ISSN0340-6199

eISSN1432-1076

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-06814-9

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-06814-9

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/515941881

Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssiCC BY

Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versioKustantajan versio


Tiivistelmä

To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced voiding ultrasonography (CEVUS) and direct radionuclide cystography (DRC) at physiological bladder filling volumes in pediatric patients with suspected vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This prospective, comparative study included 22 children with 44 renal units referred for evaluation due to recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs). Bladder function was assessed as normal through a four-hour voiding observation or uroflowmetry. All patients underwent both DRC and CEVUS on the same day, using a single catheterization. The investigations were performed by blinded radiologists. The primary outcome was VUR detection in relation to bladder filling volumes. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects and clinical outcomes in relation to radiological findings. DRC detected VUR in 72.7% of patients and 50.0% of renal units, while CEVUS detected VUR in 77.3% and 52.3% respectively. Among patients with paired bladder-filling data at first VUR detection, median bladder filling volume was 37.3% (IQR 26.7-82.4) of expected bladder capacity for DRC and 66.7% (IQR 52.9-87.3) for CEVUS (Wilcoxon signed-rank p = 0.158). At patient level, paired detection rates were comparable between modalities (exact McNemar p = 1.00). At the renal unit level, intermodality agreement was moderate (Cohen's κ = 0.59; 95% CI 0.35-0.83). DRC detected VUR in 4 renal units negative on CEVUS, whereas CEVUS detected VUR in 5 renal units negative on DRC.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki (including Helsinki University Central Hospital).


Last updated on