A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Design and rationale of the COMPARE-TAVI 2 trial: An all-comers head-to-head comparison of Evolut FX+ and Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia transcatheter heart valves




AuthorsThim, Troels; Nissen, Henrik; Niemelä, Matti; Eftekhari, Ashkan; Jalanko, Mikko; Savontaus, Mikko; Jääskeläinen, Pertti; Hensey, Mark; Jensen, Rebekka Vibjerg; Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde; Frederiksen, Christian Alcaraz; Vase, Henrik Ølholm; Pedersen, Lars; Sørensen, Henrik Toft; Christiansen, Evald Høj; Terkelsen, Christian Juhl

PublisherElsevier BV

Publication year2026

Journal: American Heart Journal

Article number107387

Volume297

ISSN0002-8703

eISSN1097-6744

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107387

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107387

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/515793111

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract

Introduction: The COMPARE-TAVI trial framework was launched for direct comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) valves. The COMPARE-TAVI 1 trial, comparing Myval/Myval Octacor versus Sapien 3/Sapien 3 Ultra transcatheter heart valves (THVs), was recently published. Here, we present the design and rationale for the COMPARE-TAVI 2 trial comparing the Evolut FX+ self-expandable THV with the Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia balloon-expandable THV.

Methods and analysis: In the COMPARE-TAVI 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06470022), patients will be randomized 1:1 between the THVs. The trial will test whether the Evolut FX+ self-expandable THV is non-inferior to the Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia balloon-expandable THV in terms of the combined 1-year primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, moderate/severe total aortic regurgitation, or moderate/severe hemodynamic THV deterioration, according to VARC-3 criteria. If non-inferiority is proven, superiority analyses may apply. Based on a power of 80%, alpha level of 0.05, one-sided test, non-inferiority margin of 4.5%, and expected event rate of 12%, the necessary sample size has been estimated to be 1364 patients. Prespecified secondary endpoints, including long-term follow-up for 10 years, will also be investigated.

Summary: The COMPARE-TAVI 2 will provide important information on the short- and long-term outcomes among patients treated with the Evolut FX+ self-expandable and the Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia balloon-expandable THVs.

Keywords: Evolut; RCT; Sapien; TAVI; THV; all comers. 


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
The COMPARE-TAVI organization was supported by a grant from The Danish Heart Foundation. The COMPARE-TAVI 2 trial was supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.


Last updated on 01/04/2026 03:35:33 PM