A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Development and psychometric properties of the instrument used to measure occupational well-being of health and social care educators
Authors: Vauhkonen, Anneli; Azimirad, Mina; Pasanen, Miko; Salminen, Leena; Rinne, Jenni; Kangasniemi, Mari; Kommusaar, Janne; Honkalampi, Kirsi; Saaranen, Terhi
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Publication year: 2026
Journal: Heliyon
Article number: e44663
Volume: 12
Issue: 4
eISSN: 2405-8440
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2026.e44663
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2026.e44663
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/515712034
Self-archived copy's licence: CC BY
Self-archived copy's version: Publisher`s PDF
Aim
To develop and psychometrically test, using Finnish data, the structural validity and internal consistency of the instrument "Occupational well-being of social and health care teachers" and to re-test the internal consistency using Estonian data.
DesignA quantitative cross-sectional survey design.
MethodsThe data were collected from health and social care educators in Finland (n = 552) and Estonia (n = 99). The Finnish data were tested for structural validity in two steps. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted to extract factors from four aspects of occupational well-being based on the theoretical model, followed by a higher-order confirmatory factor analysis to test the factor structure. The Finnish and Estonian data were tested for internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Internal consistency of the final factor structure was assessed using McDonald's omega on the Finnish data.
ResultsThe structural validity testing confirmed a higher-order 4-factors structure that was correlative: Working conditions, Work community, Worker's resources and work, and Professional competence, based on the theoretical model of occupational well-being. An underlying lower-order 15-factor structure was also established within these higher-order factors. Most of the model fit indices were exceeded but the relative fit indices, using the Tucker-Lewis Index and the Comparative Fit Index, did not reach the cut-off point value. The internal consistency was found to be from moderate to good.
ConclusionsThis study provided the first evidence of the structural validity and internal consistency of this new and developed instrument which was based on a theoretical model in an educational context. Further development and testing of some items are recommended.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
The work was supported by the OAJ’s Occupational Wellbeing fund, the University of Eastern Finland, the University of Turku, and the University of Tartu.