A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Nucleocapsid protein enhances spike- and RBD-specific humoral and cellular immune responses in protein-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine




AuthorsGröhn, Stina; Lehto, Heini; Soppela, Saana; Naves, Rauno A.; Ritvos, Mikael A.; Iakubovskaia, Alina; Lampinen, Vili; Mustonen, Iiris; Pakkala, Sanniina; Husu, Elizaveta; Kakkola, Laura; Julkunen, Ilkka; Kolehmainen, Pekka; Pasternack, Arja; Ritvos, Olli; Hankaniemi, Minna M.

PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication year2026

Journal: BMC Infectious Diseases

Article number430

Volume26

Issue1

ISSN1471-2334

eISSN1471-2334

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-12634-x

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-12634-x

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/515604024

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY NC ND

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract
Background

Current COVID-19 vaccines are effective at preventing severe disease but provide limited protection against infection and transmission, particularly as new variants emerge. Vaccines capable of inducing both systemic and mucosal immunity and robust T cell responses, may offer broader and more long-lasting protection. This study aimed to evaluate protein-based vaccine candidates incorporating SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) and its receptor-binding domain (RBD), as well as nucleocapsid protein (N) antigens administered through different immunization schemes.

Methods

Mice were immunized three times at four-week intervals with vaccine formulations containing Fc-fused RBD proteins, S, and/or N proteins. Vaccines were administered intranasally, subcutaneously, or with subcutaneous or intramuscular priming followed by intranasal boosting. Branched polyethylenimine (BPEI) was used as a mucosal adjuvant, and Adjuvant system 04 (AS04) for intramuscular administration. Depending on the experiment, BPEI or AS04 was used for subcutaneous immunizations. Systemic antibody responses were assessed from serum samples and mucosal antibody responses from bronchoalveolar lavage samples by ELISA. Cellular responses were measured from splenocytes after antigen stimulation by FluoroSpot analysis of cytokine secretion.

Results

Fc-fused RBD antigens elicited higher antibody responses than whole S protein. Inclusion of low amount of N protein enhanced RBD- and S-specific systemic and mucosal IgG and IgA responses, and significantly increased splenocyte IL-2 and IFN-γ secretion. Intranasal vaccination alone induced variable mucosal antibody responses, whereas intramuscular priming followed by intranasal boosting consistently produced higher systemic IgG levels, robust mucosal responses, and T cell activity. Neutralizing antibodies were negligible in intranasally primed groups but were detectable in most animals receiving intramuscular priming. Among all regimens, the combination of intramuscular priming with N-containing formulations generated the highest magnitude and breadth of humoral and cellular responses. All vaccine formulations were well tolerated with no adverse effects observed.

Conclusions

Protein-based vaccines incorporating N together with Fc-fused RBD antigens significantly broaden and enhance immune responses in mice. Intramuscular priming followed by intranasal boosting proved superior to other regimens, inducing strong systemic, mucosal, and cellular immunity. These findings suggest that inclusion of conserved internal virus antigens and heterologous prime-boost strategies may improve durability and breadth of protection, supporting their development as next-generation COVID-19 vaccines.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Open access funding provided by Tampere University (including Tampere University Hospital). The research was funded by Business Finland Research to Business -funding (MMH, SG, HL), Finnish Cultural Foundation (grant number #50221563, MMH, HL, SG), Research Council of Finland (grant numbers #335870 and #355414, MMH), The Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (grant numbers #3067-84b53 and #5360-cc2fc, IJ), Tampere University graduate school (SG, SS, VL), Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation (MMH, SG, HL, VL), The Research Foundation of the Pulmonary Diseases (SG), The Foundation of Onni and Hilja Tuovinen (SG), Finnish Society for Study of Infectious Diseases (SG), Tampere Science Foundation (SG), The Finnish Medical Foundation (grant number: 5106, RAN), the Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation (grant number: 20220219, RAN) and Nordic SARS Response AB (RAN, MAR, AP). The funders played no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript.


Last updated on 26/02/2026 02:53:14 PM