A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Acceptance of near-natural greenspace management relates to ecological and socio-cultural assigned values among European urbanites




AuthorsLampinen Jussi, Tuomi Maria, Fischer Leonie K., Neuenkamp Lena, Alday Josu G., Bucharova Anna, Cancellieri Laura, Casado-Arzuaga Izaskun, Čeplová Natálie, Cerveró Lluïsa, Deák Balázs, Eriksson Ove, Fellowes Mark D.E., de Manuel Beatriz Fernández, Filibeck Goffredo, González-Guzmán Adrián, Hinojosa M. Belen, Kowarik Ingo, Lumbierres Belén, Miguel Ana, Pardo Rosa, Pons Xavier, Rodríguez-García Encarna, Schröder Roland, Sperandii Marta Gaia, Unterweger Philipp, Valkó Orsolya, Vázquez Víctor, Klaus Valentin H.

PublisherElsevier GmbH

Publication year2021

JournalBasic and Applied Ecology

Journal acronymBAAE

Volume50

First page 119

Last page131

eISSN1618-0089

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2020.10.006

Web address https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179120301146

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/51149440


Abstract

Grasslands are widespread elements of urban greenspace providing recreational, psychological and aesthetic benefits to city residents. Two urban grassland types of contrasting management dominate urban greenspaces: frequently mown, species-poor short-cut lawns and less intensively managed, near-natural tall-grass meadows. The higher conservation value of tall-grass meadows makes management interventions such as converting short-cut lawns into tall-grass meadows a promising tool for urban biodiversity conservation. The societal success of such interventions, however, depends on identifying the values urban residents assign to different types of urban grasslands, and how these values translate to attitudes towards greenspace management. Using 2027 questionnaires across 19 European cities, we identify the assigned values that correlate with people's personal greenspace use and their preferences for different types of urban grasslands to determine how these values relate to the agreement with a scenario of converting 50% of their cities’ short-cut lawns into tall-grass meadows. We found that most people assigned nature-related values, such as wildness, to tall-grass meadows and utility-related values, such as recreation, to short-cut lawns. Positive value associations of wildness and species richness with tall-grass meadows, and social and nature-related greenspace activities, positively correlated with agreeing to convert short-cut lawns into tall-grass meadows. Conversely, disapproval of lawn conversion correlated with positive value associations of cleanliness and recreation potential with short-cut lawns. Here, people using greenspaces for nature-related activities were outstandingly positive about lawn conversion. The results show that the plurality of values assigned to different types of urban grasslands should be considered in urban greenspace planning. For example, tall-grass meadows could be managed to also accommodate the values associated with short-cut lawns, such as tidiness and recreation potential, to support their societal acceptance.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 22:24