A4 Refereed article in a conference publication

Reimagining Trustworthy Robot Fleets with Animal Analogies




AuthorsHyökki, Suvi; Phillips, Elizabeth K.; Melles, Lydia; Laakasuo, Michael

EditorsGray, Colin M.; Ciliotta Chehade, Estefania; Hekkert, Paul; Forlano, Laura; Ciuccarelli, Paolo; Lloyd, Peter

Conference nameDesign Research Society Conference

PublisherDesign Research Society

Publication year2024

Journal: Proceedings of DRS : Design Research Society International Conference

Book title DRS2024 : Boston

Article number196

Volume2024

ISBN978-1-912294-62-6

eISSN2398-3132

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.718

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.718

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508973159

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY NC

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract
In the future, multi-agent robot fleets will be important for domains like agriculture, space exploration, and air combat. Trust of human-machine teams is needed to make the teams resilient to the faults of both human and robot teammates. Trust in multi-agent systems is often fragile: if any agent in the system is less reliable than the others, people will stop interacting with all of them. Studying relationships in human-animal systems can provide useful insights into designing humanrobot systems. We present a method for gathering insight into how humans, working with animal systems think about the relationships between the individuals and the whole, and suggest how animal system models can be used as analogies and practical design features for the design of robot systems in order to increase trust. Using a more-than-human approach in design research phase of human-robot interaction, supports more secure collaboration between humans and robot systems.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Part of the work in this study was funded by Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation. This work was also supported in part by George Mason University’s Office of Research, Innovation, and Economic Impact (ORIEI) award #215134.


Last updated on 11/02/2026 10:49:44 AM