A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Ceiling effects in the EOSQ-24 may limit its ability to assess treatment outcomes in early-onset scoliosis




TekijätSaarinen, Antti Juhani

KustantajaSpringer Science and Business Media LLC

Julkaisuvuosi2026

Lehti: Spine deformity

ISSN2212-134X

eISSN2212-1358

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-026-01293-2

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43390-026-01293-2

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508918310

Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssiCC BY

Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versioKustantajan versio


Tiivistelmä

Background: The 24-item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) is a condition-specific instrument to assess health-related quality of life in children with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Previous studies have raised concerns regarding ceiling effects, i.e. clustering of scores at the upper limit, which may reduce the ability of the EOSQ-24 to detect clinical improvements.
Methods: A structured review of published clinical studies reporting EOSQ-24 scores was performed. Data were standardized to a 0–100 scale. For each domain weighted mean scores, standard deviations (SD), and ceiling effect percentages were calculated. A ceiling effect≥15% was considered significant.

Results: Data from 16 studies were included. Significant ceiling effects were observed in the following domains: pulmonary function (28%), physical function (25%), overall satisfaction (22%), transfer (20%), financial burden (22%), daily living (18%), fatigue/energy level (18%), and emotion (16%). Lower ceiling effects were noted in general health, pain/discomfort, parental burden, and child/parent satisfaction domains.

Conclusions: Eight of EOSQ-24 domains exhibit marked ceiling effects, potentially limiting responsiveness to treatment effects in patients with high baseline function. These findings support consideration of revised scoring strategies or adjunctive measures in EOS outcome assessment. The presence of marked ceiling effect should be noted as a limitation in studies.Objective pulmonary function testing should be implemented in future studies.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
Open Access funding provided by University of Turku (including Turku University Central Hospital). Research funding from Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation and Vappu Uuspää Foundation.


Last updated on