B1 Other refereed article (e.g., editorial, letter, comment) in a scientific journal

Ecology for a social revolution: Re-defining the role of ecological and environmental science professionals and their responsibilities towards society




AuthorsYannelli, Florencia; Visakorpi, Kristiina; Arponen, Anni; Arnillas, Carlos; Chamorro, Javiera Chinga; Chiuffo, Mariana; Collinge, Sharon; Cousens, Roger; Devarajan, Kadambari; Ehrlich, Ken; Grell-Brisk, Marilyn; Kariuki, Rebecca; Kharouba, Heather; Ortiz, Andrea Monica; Prado-Valladares, Ana; Regan, Helen; Schnabel, Florian; Soares, Bruno; Stotz, Gisela; Williams, Michael; Cadotte, Marc W.

PublisherPensoft Publishers

Publication year2025

Journal: Research Ideas and Outcomes

Article numbere152859

Volume11

eISSN2367-7163

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3897/rio.11.e152859

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.11.e152859

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508795186

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract

The sixth mass extinction and the ongoing biodiversity and climate crises demand urgent action from ecologists and environmental scientists (EESs). Despite their critical role in addressing these challenges, EESs face unclear professional responsibilities towards society, local communities and ecosystems. The 2024 ANdiNA workshop was held in Conguillío National Park in Chile, within Wallmapu the ancestral land of the Mapuche people. It gathered global EESs to explore the roles, obligations and accountability of professionals in this field. The discussions focused on the evolving responsibilities of EESs amidst the environmental crises, as well as the need for clearer frameworks to guide their actions.

Key questions included the scope of EESs' professional activities, how their obligations should adapt during times of crisis and whether they should be held accountable for scientific mistakes that lead to negative societal outcomes. The workshop explored the potential for creating a codified framework, such as an oath or manifesto, to clarify EESs' professional responsibilities. Participants highlighted the importance of integrating financial, intellectual, ethical and institutional dimensions in defining these roles, particularly in how EESs engage with local communities and society.

Emerging themes included the need for a shared framework to align EESs' actions, exemplified by the Conguillío Statement, which encourages collaboration, inclusivity and ethical engagement with communities, especially Indigenous ones. The workshop also emphasised the importance of solution-orientated, transformative research and advocacy, calling for a shift in how EESs approach their roles as agents of change. By critically reflecting on their responsibilities, the workshop provided a foundation for re-imagining the role of EESs in the face of global environmental crises, urging systemic, collaborative approaches to safeguarding both nature and humanity.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
The workshop was partly funded by the University of California, Riverside, USA and facilitated pro bono by Michael Williams. Funding from the University of Toronto helped support travel of ECRs. Additional funding sources include the Kone Foundation (grant number 202203652) for AA, CONICET (PIBAA 2022–2023) for MCC, the Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft in Freiburg im Breisgau for FS, and the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung through the Feodor Lynen Fellowship for FAY.


Last updated on 03/02/2026 10:17:10 AM