A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Severe aortic stenosis detection using seismocardiography
Authors: Pykäri, Jouni; Elnaggar, Ismail; Kaisti, Matti; Airola, Antti; Koivisto, Tero; Vasankari, Tuija; Savontaus, Mikko
Publisher: BMJ
Publication year: 2026
Journal: Open Heart
Article number: e003563
Volume: 13
ISSN: 2398-595X
eISSN: 2053-3624
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003563
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003563
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508662864
Self-archived copy's licence: CC BY NC
Self-archived copy's version: Publisher`s PDF
Background Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are at high risk of mortality, regardless of symptom status. Despite this, aortic valve replacement rates remain low for patients with severe AS due to challenges in identifying clinically significant AS in time. This has prompted the need to develop and investigate novel diagnostic modalities. The objective of this study was to develop and validate novel, non-invasive diagnostic algorithm leveraging seismocardiography (SCG) data to detect severe AS.
Method A device capable of collecting a single-lead ECG and a three-dimensional SCG signal using a microelectromechanical-based accelerometer was used to collect sensor data. Phase 1 data were collected for training and validation of an algorithm for AS detection. Phase 2 data were collected as a blinded independent test set with age-matched and sex-matched patients as controls.
Results In phase 1 of the study, 115 subjects (n=56 AS patients and n=59 controls; mean age 73.8±10.4 years) were collected for training and validation of an algorithm for AS detection. Once model development was complete, the frozen model was then evaluated in a fully independent, single blinded phase 2 cohort of 99 subjects (n=50 AS patients and n=49 controls; mean age 76.8±6.4 years) for final analysis. The algorithm accurately classified 89 out of 99 patients, with four true AS cases misclassified as controls and six true control cases misclassified as AS. The sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of the model were 92% (95% CI 84.5% to 99.5%), 87.8% (95% CI 78.6% to 96.9%), and 96% (95% CI 91.9% to 99.9%), respectively.
Conclusions This SCG-based algorithm to detect severe AS demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity when tested in a blinded, age-matched and sex-matched cohort. These findings suggest that this technology may hold potential as a low-cost diagnostic tool for the detection of AS.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
This study was funded by State Research Funding. The funder did not participate in the study's design, conduct, data collection, management, analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, review, approval or submission for publication.