A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Low-complexity fetal heart rate monitoring from carbon-based single-channel dry electrodes maternal electrocardiogram




AuthorsLikitalo, Susanna; Anzanpour, Arman; Axelin, Anna; Jaako, Tommi; Celka, Patrick

PublisherIOP Publishing

Publication year2026

Journal: Physiological Measurement

Article number015006

Volume47

ISSN0967-3334

eISSN1361-6579

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae3365

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae3365

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508634108

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract

Objective

Fetal and maternal health during pregnancy can be monitored with sensors such as Doppler or scalp fetal ECG. This study focuses on single-channel dry electrode maternal abdominal ECG (aECG) to extract fetal heart rate (fHR) using a low-complexity algorithm suitable for low-power wearables.

Approach

A hybrid model combining machine learning, QRS masking, and data fusion was trained on two PhysioNet databases and synthetically generated aECG. Model selection employed the Akaike criterion with data balancing and random sampling.

Main results

The algorithm was tested on 80 recordings from the Computer in Cardiology Challenge 2013 (CCC) and the abdominal and direct fetal database (ADFD), augmented with 100 synthetic aECG. Performance for fetal QRS detection reached Precision = 97.2(82.2)%, Specificity = 99.8(93.8)%, and Sensitivity = 97.4(93.9)% on ADFD and CCC, respectively. Clinical validation used the Polar Electro Oy H10 dry-electrode device at the Maternity Hospital of Southwest Finland. Four subjects (gestational age 39.8 ± 1.3weeks) were analyzed, with seven discarded. For fHR, the mean absolute percentage error was 1.9 ± 1.0%, Availability 79.6 ± 3.9%, and coverage probability CP5 = 76.2%, CP10 = 87.5%.

Significance

These results demonstrate the feasibility of fHR monitoring from dryelectrode aECG tailored for low-power wearables. Signal quality in clinical subjects matched the lowest PhysioNet cases, confirming robustness under low signal-to-noise conditions.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This project is supported by the Chips Joint Undertaking (Grant Agreement No. 101095792) and its members Finland, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. This work includes top-up funding from the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI). In addition, Finnish partner receives funding from Business Finland (4136/31/2022).


Last updated on 28/01/2026 02:59:25 PM