A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Using implementation science to bridge the gaps between political commitment and action in antimicrobial resistance governance under the one health approach in the WHO Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions
Tekijät: Yu, Xiaoran; Wang, Huan; Wang, Jian; Yuan, Xin; Zhou, Xiaoding; He, Qiushui; Mokrousov, Igor; Sun, Lin; Dong, Yanhui; Zou, Zhiyong
Kustantaja: Elsevier BV
Julkaisuvuosi: 2026
Lehti: The Lancet regional health : Western Pacific
Artikkelin numero: 101783
Vuosikerta: 66
eISSN: 2666-6065
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101783
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101783
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508400112
Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssi: CC BY NC ND
Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versio: Kustantajan versio
The WHO Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions, home to more than half of the world's population, bear a disproportionate burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), including some of the most severe resistance patterns. The convergence of rapidly growing economies and persistent health system challenges in these regions creates a critical platform for understanding the dynamics of AMR and developing scalable governance approaches relevant to other low- and middle-income countries. This Viewpoint reviews current progress in AMR governance globally and study regions, with a focus on country-specific National Action Plans, and highlights the discrepancies between policy intentions and actual implementation. Implementation science, developed to address research-to-practice gaps, provides a systematic framework for identifying and overcoming barriers to implementation, thereby translating political commitments into actionable interventions. Given the cross-sectoral complexity of AMR, we propose novel strategic priorities to enhance AMR governance by embedding implementation science within the One Health approach. This involves a four-step process: selecting and adapting evidence-based practices, assessing multilevel barriers and enablers, selecting, using and adapting implementation strategies, and evaluating and sustaining their impact. Together, this framework provides a blueprint for localising and operationalising overarching policy concepts into concrete, context-specific actions, with potential lessons for other regions globally.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |