A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

European surgical guidelines: transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancers




AuthorsLechien, Jérôme R.; Paleri, Vinidh; Baudouin, Robin; Brunet, Aina; Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos M.; Crosetti, Erika; De Vito, Andrea; Cammaroto, Giovanni; De Virgilio, Armando; Fakhry, Nicolas; Golusinski, Wojciech; Irjala, Heikki; Lang, Stefan; Leemans, C. Rene; Moriniere, Sylvain; Saibene, Alberto M.; Sampieri, Claudio; Siddiq, Somiah; Vander Poorten, Vincent; Viros Porcuna, David; Vergez, Sébastien; Briganti, Giovanni; Maniaci, Antonino; Remacle, Marc; Simon, Christian; Hans, Stéphane

Publication year2026

Journal: Oral Oncology

Article number107826

Volume173

ISSN1368-8375

eISSN1879-0593

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107826

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingNo Open Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107826


Abstract
Background

Substantial heterogeneity in practice exists across centers regarding the indications and perioperative care for patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for head and neck cancer. This consensus paper aims to propose a European surgical practice guideline in this setting.

Methods

Twenty-two experts from European and International scientific societies participated in a modified Delphi process for rating and validating statements about indications, contraindications, surgical outcomes, and pre- and postoperative care associated with TORS for head and neck cancer care. Consensus was deemed to have been achieved when two-thirds of experts agreed or strongly agreed with the statement; those with fewer than one-third agreement were improved and resubmitted for voting until final validation or rejection.

Results

Of the initial 41 statements, 38 reached consensus after three voting rounds. Statements propose recommendations for the preoperative assessment (n = 7), indications and contraindications for TORS in oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and hypopharyngeal primaries (n = 10), surgical outcomes to be reported (n = 7), postoperative care (n = 8), and clinical research (n = 6). TORS is appropriate for small, accessible oropharyngeal and supraglottic tumors with favorable exposure. The contraindications set out in detail for oropharyngeal, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal lesions will assist in decision-making, especially when presented with a controversial clinical scenario. Standardized reporting of surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes, including swallowing, voice quality, and survival rates, is essential for evidence-based practice. TORS represents a promising avenue for therapeutic de-escalation in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers.

Conclusion

The European TORS surgical consensus provides clinical recommendations for the indications, contraindications, surgical and perioperative care for TORS management of head and neck malignancies.


Funding information in the publication
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.


Last updated on 26/01/2026 05:28:14 PM