A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
European surgical guidelines: transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancers
Authors: Lechien, Jérôme R.; Paleri, Vinidh; Baudouin, Robin; Brunet, Aina; Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos M.; Crosetti, Erika; De Vito, Andrea; Cammaroto, Giovanni; De Virgilio, Armando; Fakhry, Nicolas; Golusinski, Wojciech; Irjala, Heikki; Lang, Stefan; Leemans, C. Rene; Moriniere, Sylvain; Saibene, Alberto M.; Sampieri, Claudio; Siddiq, Somiah; Vander Poorten, Vincent; Viros Porcuna, David; Vergez, Sébastien; Briganti, Giovanni; Maniaci, Antonino; Remacle, Marc; Simon, Christian; Hans, Stéphane
Publication year: 2026
Journal: Oral Oncology
Article number: 107826
Volume: 173
ISSN: 1368-8375
eISSN: 1879-0593
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107826
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: No Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Partially Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107826
Background
Substantial heterogeneity in practice exists across centers regarding the indications and perioperative care for patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for head and neck cancer. This consensus paper aims to propose a European surgical practice guideline in this setting.
MethodsTwenty-two experts from European and International scientific societies participated in a modified Delphi process for rating and validating statements about indications, contraindications, surgical outcomes, and pre- and postoperative care associated with TORS for head and neck cancer care. Consensus was deemed to have been achieved when two-thirds of experts agreed or strongly agreed with the statement; those with fewer than one-third agreement were improved and resubmitted for voting until final validation or rejection.
ResultsOf the initial 41 statements, 38 reached consensus after three voting rounds. Statements propose recommendations for the preoperative assessment (n = 7), indications and contraindications for TORS in oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and hypopharyngeal primaries (n = 10), surgical outcomes to be reported (n = 7), postoperative care (n = 8), and clinical research (n = 6). TORS is appropriate for small, accessible oropharyngeal and supraglottic tumors with favorable exposure. The contraindications set out in detail for oropharyngeal, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal lesions will assist in decision-making, especially when presented with a controversial clinical scenario. Standardized reporting of surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes, including swallowing, voice quality, and survival rates, is essential for evidence-based practice. TORS represents a promising avenue for therapeutic de-escalation in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers.
ConclusionThe European TORS surgical consensus provides clinical recommendations for the indications, contraindications, surgical and perioperative care for TORS management of head and neck malignancies.
Funding information in the publication:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.