A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Outcomes and Acceptability of the Community‐Based Occupational Well‐Being Intervention Among Health Care Educators—Mixed Method Pilot Study




TekijätVauhkonen, Anneli; Honkalampi, Kirsi; Rinne, Jenni; Salminen, Leena; Saaranen, Terhi

KustantajaWiley

Julkaisuvuosi2025

Lehti: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Artikkelin numeroe70161

Vuosikerta39

Numero4

ISSN0283-9318

eISSN1471-6712

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70161

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70161

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/505989111


Tiivistelmä
Aims and Objectives

To evaluate the outcomes and acceptability of the Community-based Participatory Occupational Well-being Intervention for Educators.

Methodological Design and Justification

This pilot study used a sequential explanatory mixed-method intervention study design in which the post-intervention qualitative data were embedded in the quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test data to explain and expand the intervention outcomes and to evaluate intervention acceptability.

Ethical Issues and Approval

This study received an ethical statement from the UEF Committee on Research Ethics (7/2021 15.4.2021) and followed the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Research Methods and Intervention

The quantitative pre-and post-test data were collected using an electronic questionnaire among health care educators (intervention n = 19, comparison n = 22). The 1-year intervention included (i) an online course, formation of (ii) an occupational well-being development team, which (iii) planned and (iv) implemented community-specific development actions. Qualitative interview data were collected from participants (n = 9) 3 months post-intervention. The quantitative data were analysed statistically and the qualitative data by deductive–inductive content analysis. The main results were merged into a joint display as mixed-method meta-inferences.

Results

Positive changes were found in occupational well-being, promoting activities and workplace support. Educators experienced improvements in work organisation processes and reflection on occupational well-being issues. The study found no significant change in the overall self-assessed level of occupational well-being. The intervention framework was considered functional, with workload issues as the main barriers.

Study Limitations

The main limitations of this study were a small sample size and a long intervention period, which challenged participant engagement and outcome evaluation.

Conclusions

The intervention enables community-level occupational well-being development, and it can be applied in health care educators' work communities. The study suggests refining the intervention in terms of information provision, time resources and community-level orientation and discussion.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This work was supported by OAJ’s Occupational Wellbeing Fund.


Last updated on