A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Fixed-Duration versus Continuous Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Tekijät: Al-Sawaf, Othman; Stumpf, Janina; Zhang, Can; Simon, Florian; Bosch, Francesc; Feyzi, Emadoldin; Ghia, Paolo; Gregor, Michael; Kater, Arnon P.; Lindström, Vesa; Mattsson, Mattias; Niemann, Carsten U.; Staber, Philipp B.; Tadmor, Tamar; Thornton, Patrick; Wendtner, Clemens-Martin; Janssens, Ann; Noesslinger, Thomas; Bohn, Jan-Paul; da Cunha-Bang, Caspar; Poulsen, Christian B.; Ranti, Juha; Illmer, Thomas; Schoettker, Bjoern; Böttcher, Sebastian; Gaska, Tobias; Vandenberghe, Elisabeth; Clifford, Ruth; Benjamini, Ohad; Frustaci, Anna Maria; Scarfò, Lydia; Sportoletti, Paolo; Schreurs, John; Levin, Mark-David; van der Straaten, Hanneke; van der Klift, Marjolein; Tran, Hoa; de la Serna, Javier; Loscertales, Javier; Lindblad, Oscar; Bergendahl Sandstedt, Anna; Goede, Jeroen; Baumann, Michael; Fink, Anna Maria; Fischer, Kirsten; Ritgen, Matthias; Kreuzer, Karl-Anton; Schneider, Christof; Tausch, Eugen; Stilgenbauer, Stephan; Robrecht, Sandra; Eichhorst, Barbara; Hallek, Michael
Kustantaja: Massachusetts Medical Society
Julkaisuvuosi: 2025
Lehti: New England Journal of Medicine
ISSN: 0028-4793
eISSN: 1533-4406
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2515458
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Ei avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Ei avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2515458
Background
Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) currently consists of two main approaches — continuous therapy with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors and fixed-duration regimens combining venetoclax with either CD20 antibodies or Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Comparisons of these two therapeutic approaches are lacking.
MethodsWe conducted an investigator-initiated, phase 3, randomized trial involving patients with previously untreated CLL. Patients were randomly assigned to receive continuous ibrutinib or fixed-duration venetoclax–obinutuzumab or venetoclax–ibrutinib. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (noninferiority margin for the hazard ratio, 1.608, corresponding to a noninferiority margin of 8 percentage points at 3 years). Secondary end points included minimal residual disease (MRD), response, overall survival, and safety.
ResultsA total of 909 patients were assigned to venetoclax–obinutuzumab (303 patients), venetoclax–ibrutinib (305 patients), or ibrutinib (301 patients). The median follow-up was 34.2 months. In this prespecified interim analysis, 3-year progression-free survival was 81.1% in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab group, 79.4% in the venetoclax–ibrutinib group, and 81.0% in the ibrutinib group (hazard ratio for venetoclax–obinutuzumab vs. ibrutinib, 0.87 [98.3% confidence interval {CI}, 0.54 to 1.41]; hazard ratio for venetoclax–ibrutinib vs. ibrutinib, 0.84 [98.0% CI, 0.53 to 1.32]); the results for each comparison met the criterion for noninferiority. After the end of treatment, MRD in peripheral blood was undetectable in 73.3% of the patients in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab group, 47.2% in the venetoclax–ibrutinib group, and 0% in the ibrutinib group. Three-year overall survival was 91.5%, 96.0%, and 95.7%, respectively. The most common adverse events were infections, gastrointestinal disorders, and cytopenias.
ConclusionsIn patients with previously untreated CLL, fixed-duration treatment with venetoclax–obinutuzumab or venetoclax–ibrutinib was noninferior to continuous ibrutinib with regard to investigator-assessed progression-free survival. (Funded by the University of Cologne and others; CLL17 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04608318; EudraCT number, 2019-003854-99.)
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
Supported by the University of Cologne; AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Roche Pharmaceuticals (funding and study drugs); and the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; project no. 524342988).