A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Fixed-Duration versus Continuous Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia




TekijätAl-Sawaf, Othman; Stumpf, Janina; Zhang, Can; Simon, Florian; Bosch, Francesc; Feyzi, Emadoldin; Ghia, Paolo; Gregor, Michael; Kater, Arnon P.; Lindström, Vesa; Mattsson, Mattias; Niemann, Carsten U.; Staber, Philipp B.; Tadmor, Tamar; Thornton, Patrick; Wendtner, Clemens-Martin; Janssens, Ann; Noesslinger, Thomas; Bohn, Jan-Paul; da Cunha-Bang, Caspar; Poulsen, Christian B.; Ranti, Juha; Illmer, Thomas; Schoettker, Bjoern; Böttcher, Sebastian; Gaska, Tobias; Vandenberghe, Elisabeth; Clifford, Ruth; Benjamini, Ohad; Frustaci, Anna Maria; Scarfò, Lydia; Sportoletti, Paolo; Schreurs, John; Levin, Mark-David; van der Straaten, Hanneke; van der Klift, Marjolein; Tran, Hoa; de la Serna, Javier; Loscertales, Javier; Lindblad, Oscar; Bergendahl Sandstedt, Anna; Goede, Jeroen; Baumann, Michael; Fink, Anna Maria; Fischer, Kirsten; Ritgen, Matthias; Kreuzer, Karl-Anton; Schneider, Christof; Tausch, Eugen; Stilgenbauer, Stephan; Robrecht, Sandra; Eichhorst, Barbara; Hallek, Michael

KustantajaMassachusetts Medical Society

Julkaisuvuosi2025

Lehti: New England Journal of Medicine

ISSN0028-4793

eISSN1533-4406

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2515458

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläEi avoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Ei avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2515458


Tiivistelmä
Background

Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) currently consists of two main approaches — continuous therapy with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors and fixed-duration regimens combining venetoclax with either CD20 antibodies or Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Comparisons of these two therapeutic approaches are lacking.

Methods

We conducted an investigator-initiated, phase 3, randomized trial involving patients with previously untreated CLL. Patients were randomly assigned to receive continuous ibrutinib or fixed-duration venetoclax–obinutuzumab or venetoclax–ibrutinib. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (noninferiority margin for the hazard ratio, 1.608, corresponding to a noninferiority margin of 8 percentage points at 3 years). Secondary end points included minimal residual disease (MRD), response, overall survival, and safety.

Results

A total of 909 patients were assigned to venetoclax–obinutuzumab (303 patients), venetoclax–ibrutinib (305 patients), or ibrutinib (301 patients). The median follow-up was 34.2 months. In this prespecified interim analysis, 3-year progression-free survival was 81.1% in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab group, 79.4% in the venetoclax–ibrutinib group, and 81.0% in the ibrutinib group (hazard ratio for venetoclax–obinutuzumab vs. ibrutinib, 0.87 [98.3% confidence interval {CI}, 0.54 to 1.41]; hazard ratio for venetoclax–ibrutinib vs. ibrutinib, 0.84 [98.0% CI, 0.53 to 1.32]); the results for each comparison met the criterion for noninferiority. After the end of treatment, MRD in peripheral blood was undetectable in 73.3% of the patients in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab group, 47.2% in the venetoclax–ibrutinib group, and 0% in the ibrutinib group. Three-year overall survival was 91.5%, 96.0%, and 95.7%, respectively. The most common adverse events were infections, gastrointestinal disorders, and cytopenias.

Conclusions

In patients with previously untreated CLL, fixed-duration treatment with venetoclax–obinutuzumab or venetoclax–ibrutinib was noninferior to continuous ibrutinib with regard to investigator-assessed progression-free survival. (Funded by the University of Cologne and others; CLL17 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04608318; EudraCT number, 2019-003854-99.)


Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
Supported by the University of Cologne; AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Roche Pharmaceuticals (funding and study drugs); and the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; project no. 524342988).


Last updated on