A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Association of Cerebral Oxygenation During Prehospital Anaesthesia and Functional Outcome: A Prospective, Observational Multi‐Centre Cohort Study of 1014 Patients




TekijätSaviluoto, Anssi; Raatiniemi, Lasse; Mäkelä, Simo; Toivonen, Tuukka; Setälä, Piritta; Kirves, Hetti; Tommila, Miretta; Toivonen, Pamela; Tukia, Simo; Nurmi, Jouni

KustantajaWiley

Julkaisuvuosi2026

Lehti: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Artikkelin numeroe70161

Vuosikerta70

Numero1

ISSN0001-5172

eISSN1399-6576

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70161

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70161

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/505886124


Tiivistelmä
Background

Many patients undergoing prehospital anaesthesia may be at risk of inadequate cerebral oxygenation due to underlying conditions or adverse events like hypotension or hypoxia. This study examined whether a decrease in regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) measured with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) during prehospital anaesthesia associates with worse outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, observational study including adult patients anaesthetised by six prehospital critical care teams. A relative cerebral desaturation event (rCDE) was defined as a ≥ 10% decrease in rSO2 for ≥ 5 min from baseline. An absolute cerebral desaturation event (aCDE) was defined as rSO2 < 60% during anaesthesia or lower than baseline if already < 60%. The primary outcome was favourable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2) at 30 days and secondary outcomes included 30-day survival, 1-year functional outcome, and 1-year survival.

Results

Among 1014 patients, 199 experienced an rCDE, with 125 (63%) having supraphysiological baseline. rCDE was not associated with outcomes. Of 182 patients with aCDE, 30-day favourable outcomes were not significantly different (30% vs. 36%, p = 0.14, adjusted OR 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.62–1.34). However, aCDE was associated with lower 30-day survival (46% vs. 58%, p = 0.006) and less favourable 1-year outcomes (31% vs. 41%, p = 0.043). Adjusted analyses showed no significant associations.

Conclusion

An rCDE was not associated with worse functional outcomes. While aCDEs were linked to unfavourable outcomes in unadjusted analyses, these associations were not significant after adjustment, highlighting the complexity of interpreting NIRS in heterogeneous populations. Condition-specific studies are needed to clarify its role.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This work was supported by FinnHEMS and Helsinki University Hospital (state funding, TYH2021224 and TYH2022320). No funding was received from any device manufacturers or pharmaceutical companies.


Last updated on