A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

International evaluation of the SEIZUre Risk in Encephalitis (SEIZURE) score for predicting acute seizure risk




TekijätHughes, Thomas; Venkatesan, Arun; Hetherington, Claire; Egbe, Franklyn Nkongho; Netravathi, M.; Thakur, Kiran T.; Baykan, Betul; Hui Jan, Tan; Arias, Susana; García-de Soto, Jesús; Kahwagi, Jamil; Vogrig, Alberto; Versace, Salvatore; Habis, Ralph; Sowmitran, Swathi; Husari, Khalil S.; Probasco, John; Hasbun, Rodrigo; Bean, Paris; Heck, Ashley; GözübatıkÇelik, Gökçen R; Ataklı, Dilek; Mayda, Domac Fusun; Ferreira, Vitor; Calado, Sofia; Sangeeth, Thuppanattumadam Ananthasubramanian; Defres, Sylviane; Romozzi, Marina; Iorio, Raffaele; Pensato, Umberto; Pleshkevich, Maria; Steriade, Claude; Sharifi-Razavi, Athena; Tabrizi, Nasim; Sipilä, Jussi; Kim, Carla Y.; Diaz-Ariza, Alexandra; Satish, Poorvikha; Gowda, Vinutha; Gowda, Chandrakanta; Oh, Seong-il; del Capio-Orantes, Luis; Cotelli, Mariasofia; Ferreira, Luís; Kovalchuk, Maria; Goncharova, Anna; Solomon, Tom; Winkler, Andrea; Guekht, Alla; Wood, Greta K.; The Global NeuroResearch Coalition; Michael, Benedict D.

KustantajaBMJ Publishing Group

Julkaisuvuosi2025

Lehti: BMJ Open

Artikkelin numeroe099451

Vuosikerta15

eISSN2044-6055

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099451

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099451

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/505884394


Tiivistelmä

Objective 

Encephalitis is brain parenchyma inflammation, frequently resulting in seizures which worsens outcomes. Early anti-seizure medication could improve outcomes but requires identifying patients at greatest risk of acute seizures. The SEIZURE (SEIZUre Risk in Encephalitis) score was developed in UK cohorts to stratify patients by acute seizure risk. A ‘basic score’ used Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), fever and age; the ‘advanced score’ added aetiology. This study aimed to evaluate the score internationally to determine its global applicability.

Design 

Patients were retrospectively analysed regionally, and by country, in this international evaluation study. Univariate analysis was conducted between patients who did and did not have inpatient seizures, followed by multivariable logistic regression, hierarchical clustering and analysis of the area under the receiver operating curves (AUROC) with 95% CIs.

Participants and setting 2032 patients across 13 countries were identified, among whom 1324 were included in SEIZURE score calculations and 970 were included in regression modelling. The involved countries comprised 19 organisations spanning all WHO regions.

Outcome measures 

The primary outcome was measuring inpatient seizure rates.

Results 

Autoantibody-associated encephalitis, low GCS and presenting with a seizure were frequently associated with inpatient seizures; fever showed no association. Globally, the score had limited discriminatory ability (basic AUROC 0.58 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.62), advanced AUROC 0.63 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.66)). The scoring system performed acceptably in western Europe, excluding Spain, with the best performance in Portugal (basic AUROC 0.82 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.94), advanced AUROC 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.95)).

Conclusions 

The SEIZURE score performed best in several countries in Western Europe but performed poorly elsewhere, partly due to differing and unknown aetiologies. In most regions, the score did not reach a threshold to be clinically useful. The Western European results could aid in designing clinical trials assessing primary anti-seizure prophylaxis in encephalitis following further prospective trials. Beyond Western Europe, there is a need for tailored, localised scoring systems and future large-scale prospective studies with optimised aetiological testing to accurately identify high-risk patients.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This research was funded jointly by the Wellcome Trust (315711/Z/24/Z) and the MRC/UKRI (MR/V007181/1). BDM is supported by the UKRI/MRC (MR/V03605X/1), MRC (MR/T028750/1) and Wellcome (ISSF201902/3). BDM is also supported by the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), in collaboration with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and the University of Oxford (award 200907), NIHR HPRU in Respiratory Infections at Imperial College London with PHE (award 200927). GKW is supported by the NIHR i4i FAST (NIHR208981). FNE is supported by the Wellcome Trust (315711/Z/24/Z). CS received funding for the study from NINDS - R01NS126156.


Last updated on 2025-15-12 at 13:17