A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Radiation Exposure during Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Nationwide Study of Patient Doses in Finland
Authors: Laurén, Jouni; Kaasalainen, Touko; Kesävuori, Risto; Nikulainen, Veikko; Suominen, Velipekka; Hakulinen, Ullamari; Karjalainen, Jari; Kariniemi, Juho; Venermo, Maarit; Aho, Pekka; Finnish Radiation Safety Collaboration Group
Publisher: Elsevier
Publication year: 2025
Journal: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
ISSN: 1078-5884
eISSN: 1532-2165
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.11.058
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Partially Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.11.058
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/505814914
Self-archived copy's licence: CC BY NC ND
Self-archived copy's version: Publisher`s PDF
Objective
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) predisposes patients to significant radiation exposure, with well known harmful effects. This study aimed to assess the radiation doses and their consistency in Finland and to investigate the factors affecting the doses, to potentially allow future dose reductions.
MethodsThis retrospective, nationwide, multicentre study included all patients who underwent an elective standard EVAR procedure in Finland between 2017 – 2022. Data were collected from: body mass index (BMI); fluoroscopy time (FT); radiation exposure, including kerma area product (KAP) and cumulative air kerma at the patient reference entrance point (Ka,r) from fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography (DSA); number of DSA series; and exposure parameters of the angiography systems. Descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses were performed to identify the parameters that significantly influenced radiation exposure.
ResultsA total of 1 185 EVAR procedures from all five centres that perform EVAR in Finland were included in the study. Large variation in medians of total procedure KAP between the centres was observed, ranging 22.5 – 135.0 Gy·cm2. Median FT ranged 16.1 – 29.1 minutes. Both fluoroscopy and DSA showed large variation in radiation exposure. BMI did not significantly differ between the centres. The factors significantly affecting the dose in the multivariate linear regression model were BMI, FT, number of DSA acquisitions, DSA frame rate, and maximum copper filtration in fluoroscopy.
ConclusionSurprisingly high, up to six fold, intercentre variability in total procedure radiation exposure was observed. The variability in the doses was mostly attributable to differences in exposure parameters (e.g., dose at detector level, copper filtration, and pulse rate); the manner in which radiation is utilised also played a significant role. In other words, both angiography system parameters and the working habits of the operator need to be optimised.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
None.