A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Strategic technology competition revisited: A National Innovation System rationale for China's artificial intelligence standardisation strategy




AuthorsZhu, Junhua; Sinkkonen, Elina; Mattlin, Mikael

PublisherElsevier BV

Publication year2025

Journal: Telecommunications Policy

Article number103114

ISSN0308-5961

eISSN1879-3258

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103114

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103114

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/505648121


Abstract

This article explains why and how China aims to set international standards in artificial intelligence (AI), by analysing AI standardisation's place within China's National Innovation System (NIS). Emerging technologies, such as AI, where global norms and governance institutions are yet to be established, offer greater possibilities for latecomers to set international standards. As areas of AI are general-purpose technologies, it matters what kind of standards are set, and who sets them. Building on arguments that domestic technology diffusion has become more important than innovation capacity, we contend that in strategic technology competition it is essential for great powers to diffuse their technology solutions internationally, for which standardisation is a key channel. Through a detailed analysis of China's AI innovation system, we argue that China's AI-related NIS is maturing. China has already developed national AI standards, and its standard-setting is internationalising, as our analysis of Chinese policy documents on AI standardisation shows. Lingering weaknesses in basic AI research, however, still limit the potential for Chinese firms to set de facto standards through market competition, beyond specific AI applications. Amid intense Sino-US strategic technology competition, China's possibilities to successfully pursue international committee- or government-led standardisation, and thereby technology diffusion, have also been restricted. Yet, the recent US turn away from promoting a rules-based order opens new possibilities for Chinese standardisation efforts. The Chinese government has promoted market- and firm-led standardisation around open-source solutions, while increasingly targeting its multilateral standard-setting towards the ‘Global South’, e.g. through its 2025 Action Plan for Global Artificial Intelligence Governance.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
The research for this paper has been supported by a grant from Business Finland [grant decision 4367/31/2023] for the project ‘Technical standards as critical intangible capital for Finnish companies in an era of strategic competition’ (StandardEdge). The authors have also benefited from institutional support provided by The Finnish Institute of International Affairs and the University of Turku during the time of research design, research and writing.


Last updated on 2025-01-12 at 09:50