A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
MRI edema patterns in acute neck infections: A multicenter and multidisciplinary interobserver study
Authors: Vierula, Jari-Pekka; Aro, Katri; Bode, Michaela; Haapio, Eeva; Hakumäki, Juhana; Happonen, Tatu; Hollmén, Carita; Huhtanen, Heidi; Irjala, Heikki; Jouppila-Mättö, Anna; Jussila, Ville; Kaapu, Kalle; Karhu, Jari O.; Koivunen, Petri; Kolasa, Marcin; Kovalainen, Antti; Kurdo, Goran; Kytö, Eero; Laurikainen, Tiina; Lindén, Riikka; Martikainen, Ilkka; Nyman, Kristofer; Paananen, Timo; Paavilainen, Teemu; Saravo, Jarkko; Tähtinen, Jutta; Tammilehto, Ville; Velhonoja, Jarno; Ånäs, Niklas; Sirén, Aapo; Heikkinen, Jaakko; Nurminen, Janne; Nyman, Mikko; Mattila, Kimmo; Hirvonen, Jussi
Publisher: Elsevier
Publication year: 2026
Journal: European Journal of Radiology
Article number: 112526
Volume: 194
ISSN: 0720-048X
eISSN: 1872-7727
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112526
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Partially Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112526
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/505605345
Purpose
To assess the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiologists and surgeons in detecting prognostic MRI edema patterns, retropharyngeal (RPE) and mediastinal (ME) edema, in acute neck infections, supporting their clinical integration into emergency imaging workflows. These patterns are known to predict disease severity, yet their reliable identification across specialties remains untested until now.
MethodsIn this multicenter observational study, 28 readers (comprising radiology residents, board-certified radiologists, and head and neck surgeons from five academic hospitals) evaluated axial T2-weighted Dixon MRI images from 60 patients with clinically confirmed acute neck infections. Readers, blinded to clinical data such as patient symptoms or laboratory results, assessed images for RPE and ME presence and rated their confidence. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver agreement (Fleiss’ kappa) were calculated against a consensus standard set by two fellowship-trained neuroradiologists. Intraobserver consistency was tested by repeating 10 randomly selected cases, unbeknownst to readers.
ResultsOverall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.92, 0.80, and 0.87 for RPE and 0.88, 0.86, and 0.85 for ME, with substantial interobserver agreement (κ = 0.61 for RPE, 0.52 for ME). Radiologists outperformed surgeons in RPE sensitivity (p = 0.007), RPE accuracy (p = 0.04), ME sensitivity (p = 0.01), and ME accuracy (p = 0.02), with intraobserver consistency reaching 90 %. Confidence was high, averaging 4.3 for RPE and 4.1 for ME, and strongly correlated with accuracy (p < 0.001), reinforcing diagnostic reliability.
ConclusionPhysicians reliably detect MRI edema patterns across expertise levels, validating their use for risk stratification in acute neck infections and supporting broader adoption in clinical practice where MRI is available.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
Jussi Hirvonen reports financial support was provided by Sigrid Jusélius Foundation.