A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Beyond anthropocentrism: ethical pluralism and animal perspectives in Finnish primary school textbooks




AuthorsRouhiainen, Henna; Aarnio, Jenna

PublisherTaylor & Francis

Publication year2025

Journal: Environmental Education Research

ISSN1350-4622

eISSN1469-5871

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2025.2579508

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2025.2579508

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/505479179


Abstract

Sustainability transformation requires that Western societies reconsider the values and worldviews they assign to animals. This study examines whether formal education in Finland supports this change by conveying non-anthropocentric and pluralistic ethical perspectives of animals in primary school textbooks. We conducted a theory-based content analysis on history, social studies, environmental studies, religious education, and ethics textbooks, exercises, and teachers’ materials for grades 5–6 in Finland. Our findings reveal that the textbooks contain both anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric ethical perspectives of animals. While anthropocentric and ecocentric worldviews were pronounced, relational perspectives were notably scarce. Additionally, there was a clear discrepancy between different school subjects and different textbook series in the variety and number of perspectives and value discussion. We suggest that textbook publishers aim at increasing ethical reflection, relational perspectives, and a better integration of values and worldviews related to animals across subjects.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Both authors received funding for conducting the research from Kone Foundation under grant [number 202406742].


Last updated on 2025-21-11 at 11:29