A4 Vertaisarvioitu artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussa
Ethical Aspects of Distributed Extended Reality Training
Tekijät: Heimo, Olli I.; Lehtonen, Teijo
Toimittaja: Alvarez, Isabel; Arias-Oliva, Mario; Dediu, Adrian-Horia; Silva, Nuno
Konferenssin vakiintunut nimi: International Conference on the Ethical and Social Impacts of ICT
Kustantaja: Springer Nature Switzerland
Julkaisuvuosi: 2025
Lehti: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Kokoomateoksen nimi: Ethical and Social Impacts of Information and Communication Technology : 22nd International Conference, ETHICOMP 2025, Lisbon, Portugal, September 17–19, 2025, Proceedings
Vuosikerta: 15939
Aloitussivu: 215
Lopetussivu: 226
ISBN: 978-3-032-01428-3
eISBN: 978-3-032-01429-0
ISSN: 0302-9743
eISSN: 1611-3349
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01429-0_19
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Ei avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Ei avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01429-0_19
This study explores the ethical implications of implementing Distributed Extended Reality (XR) in the context of remote education and training. As XR technologies evolve and become increasingly integrated into learning environments, particularly in technical fields requiring hands-on experience, new ethical questions arise. The research applies a deductive method within the framework of Virtuous Just Consequentialism, an extension of Moor’s Just Consequentialism, to evaluate whether distributed XR systems can be implemented without amplifying existing ethical concerns. The analysis focuses specifically on the unique ethical characteristics of distributed XR. Key findings indicate that, under certain conditions, distributed XR solutions can be deployed in ethically sound ways that do not exacerbate existing problems. In some cases, distributed XR may even offer improvements over traditional remote education by enhancing engagement, reducing resource waste, and enabling broader access to complex technical training. However, challenges related to usability, equality, and technological limitations remain, particularly for novice users and vulnerable groups. The use of a multi-ethical analytical framework proved helpful for exploring these layered issues, though its complexity can pose interpretive difficulties. The study concludes that distributed XR holds promise as an ethical training technology, provided that implementation is carefully designed with attention to inclusive access, technological fairness, and the cultivation of virtue in both learners and systems. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
