A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Comparison of missing data handling methods for variant pathogenicity predictors




AuthorsSärkkä, Mikko; Myöhänen, Sami; Marinov, Kaloyan; Saarinen, Inka; Lahti, Leo; Fortino, Vittorio; Paananen, Jussi

PublisherOxford University Press (OUP)

Publication year2025

Journal:NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics: Nucleic Acids Research Genomics and Bioinformatics

Article numberlqaf133

Volume7

Issue4

ISSN2631-9268

eISSN2631-9268

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaf133

Web address https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaf133

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/504736398


Abstract
Modern clinical genetic tests utilize next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches to comprehensively analyze genetic variants from patients. Out of millions of variants, clinically relevant variants that match the patient's phenotype must be identified accurately and rapidly. As manual evaluation is not a feasible option for meeting the speed and volume requirements of clinical genetic testing, automated solutions are needed. Various machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), and in silico variant pathogenicity predictors have been developed to solve this challenge. These solutions rely on comprehensive data and struggle with the sparse genetic annotations. Therefore, careful treatment of missing data is necessary, and the selected methods may have a huge impact on the accuracy, reliability, speed and associated computational costs. We present an open-source framework called AMISS that can be used to evaluate performance of different methods for handling missing genetic variant data in the context of variant pathogenicity prediction. Using AMISS, we evaluated 14 methods for handling missing values. The performance of these methods varied substantially in terms of precision, computational costs, and other attributes. Overall, simpler imputation methods and specifically mean imputation performed best.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
No external funding.


Last updated on 2025-21-10 at 11:55