A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Assessing Quality of Life in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer in a Prospective Single-Center Observational Study
Authors: Miinalainen, Sofia; Löyttyniemi, Eliisa; Jyrkkiö, Sirkku; Akrén, Outi
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert
Publication year: 2025
Journal: Journal of Palliative Medicine
Article number: 10966218251383708
ISSN: 1096-6218
eISSN: 1557-7740
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218251383708
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: No Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Partially Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218251383708
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/504673626
Self-archived copy's version: Final draft
Background and Purpose
Patients with pancreatic cancer have an extensive symptom burden and a modest quality of life (QoL). Our aim was to evaluate three QoL questionnaires in clinical practice and monitor patients’ symptoms over a 4-month follow-up period.
Materials and Methods
The study included 54 patients with pancreatic cancer in a single-center University Hospital in Finland. The QoL questionnaires involved were the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-PAL, QLQ-C30, and QLQ-PAN26. Patients completed the questionnaires at baseline and at 2 and 4 months.
Results
All three questionnaires served as a tool for facilitating dialogue between patient and physician. No relevant changes were observed in reported symptoms, concerns, or QoL during the follow-up period. However, the amount of missing data increased over time due to patients’ declining health or death. The main reported concern was worry about future health.
Conclusion
The shorter 15-question survey seemed to capture an adequate picture of patient well-being. The QLQ-PAN26 added valuable insight, as it focuses on pancreatic cancer-related symptoms. The information gathered from these QoL questionnaires can be used both to emphasize patients’ concerns and to support decision making.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |