A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Puberty‐Promoting Treatment and Psychosocial Well‐Being in Boys With Constitutional Delay of Puberty: A Randomized Controlled Trial




AuthorsKariola, Laura; Varimo, Tero; Laaperi, Mitja; Huopio, Hanna; Tenhola, Sirpa; Voutilainen, Raimo; Toppari, Jorma; Kosola, Silja; Miettinen, Päivi J.; Raitakari, Olli; Elovainio, Marko; Raivio, Taneli; Hero, Matti

PublisherWiley

Publication year2025

Journal:Clinical Endocrinology

Article numbercen.70039

ISSN0300-0664

eISSN1365-2265

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cen.70039

Web address https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.70039

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/504673203


Abstract

Objective: In boys, constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) has been associated with diverse negative psychosocial effects. Albeit alleviating distress is one of the main reasons for inducing pubertal development, the impact of puberty-promoting treatment on psychosocial wellbeing is under-researched. Our objective was to investigate the impact of puberty-promoting therapies on the behavioural patterns as defined by the temperament characteristics emotionality, activity, and sociability (EAS) in boys with CDGP.

Design: The study is a randomized, controlled, open-label trial.

Patients: Thirty boys were randomized to receive either aromatase inhibitor letrozole (2.5 mg/day) (n = 15) or intramuscular testosterone (1 mg/kg/every 4 weeks) (n = 15) for 6 months and followed up to 12 months. To compare our results with healthy peers, an age- and postal-code matched, and a national reference population were collected.

Measurements: Temperament characteristics were evaluated with a standardized and validated questionnaire at 0-, 6-, and 12-month visits.

Results: In comparison to local peers, boys with CDGP were more withdrawn (p = 0.02) and experienced less anger (p = 0.02) and fear (p = 0.02). Compared to both local and national controls, there was a significant difference in emotionality, CDGP boys being less negatively emotional than peers (p = 0.04). Sociability was higher in the Lz-group in comparison to the T-group both after the 6-month treatment period (-0.48, 95% CI: 0.89; -0.08, p = 0.019) and at 12-month follow-up (-0.72, CI: 95%, -1.12; -0.32, p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Overall, boys with CDGP exhibited a generally docile temperament. The administration of puberty-promoting treatments did not result in any adverse psychosocial effects on the temperament characteristics assessed.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This study was supported by the Academy of Finland, the Foundation for Pediatric Research (8.9.2021), Helsinki University Hospital Research Funds (5.11.2024), Orion Research Foundation (28.10.2022), Yrjoe Jahnsson Foundation (20227528), Maud Kuistila Memorial Foundation (2024-0267B), Paeivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation (19.12.2022) and Eemil Aaltonen Foundation (30.4.2024).


Last updated on 2025-04-11 at 11:49